Jagten

'United'

So maybe he's just seen as a defender for depth and not a starter which if so iam ok with it. Why not get Mbiwa now then? He can cover the whole back line. I presume because he's captain of Montpellier who have a chance of winning the league in France and probably dont want to sell him during the season and will be easier to buy in the summer and cheaper than he will be in January. ...... and breath.

They are brilliant

ITK is mark douglas......

did brum not bid last season?

Based on what? His inability to use his left foot, i think he would be much more comfortable on the right. he does use his left foot. you think maldini, lahm etc would be more comfortable on the right. i'm not saying he is or isn't this or that just the idea of ' he's right footed so should play on the right ' is s****. Lahm can tackle with his left, so could Maldini, Santon cant do that. He will always look to tackle with his right, which leaves him exposed and vulnerable when the man goes to the byline.... You cant use Maldini's ability as reasoning for playing him LB. can't really remember anyone going past santon on the outside when he hasn't been done for positioning (more naive than owt else) Off the top of my head, downing did. whats he doing over there, the left footed downing ? Playing on the right, going down santons left..... thats my point about not judging players by what foot they are supposedly strongest on, downing is left footed. your theory would say he should be on the left also i don't remember downing doing him time and time again or are you picking on one occasion, if you do i'll claim jose getting burned off by routledge a few times when qpr played up here in the championship season. Downing is a winger. You cannot draw parallels. He doesn't have to defend, that logic is deeply flawed. My want to play santon on the right, is due to defensive reasoning, not attacking. As when a player attacks he may dictate which foot he uses, when you are defending, you do not. Downing is not forced to attack on his right foot is he..... did downing take him to the cleaners or are you talking about one occasion, like i say i'm citing routledge doing jose (whom we'll call the standard) a few times up here. The routledge enrique case is irrelevant. Thats performance related, not foot related. No, downing didn't take him to the cleaners. But he did have the beating of him on a few occasions, where his inability to tackle with his left gave away set pieces.

Preferably a new one.

Based on what? His inability to use his left foot, i think he would be much more comfortable on the right. he does use his left foot. you think maldini, lahm etc would be more comfortable on the right. i'm not saying he is or isn't this or that just the idea of ' he's right footed so should play on the right ' is s****. Lahm can tackle with his left, so could Maldini, Santon cant do that. He will always look to tackle with his right, which leaves him exposed and vulnerable when the man goes to the byline.... You cant use Maldini's ability as reasoning for playing him LB. can't really remember anyone going past santon on the outside when he hasn't been done for positioning (more naive than owt else) Off the top of my head, downing did. whats he doing over there, the left footed downing ? Playing on the right, going down santons left..... thats my point about not judging players by what foot they are supposedly strongest on, downing is left footed. your theory would say he should be on the left also i don't remember downing doing him time and time again or are you picking on one occasion, if you do i'll claim jose getting burned off by routledge a few times when qpr played up here in the championship season. Downing is a winger. You cannot draw parallels. He doesn't have to defend, that logic is deeply flawed. My want to play santon on the right, is due to defensive reasoning, not attacking. As when a player attacks he may dictate which foot he uses, when you are defending, you do not. Downing is not forced to attack on his right foot is he.....

Based on what? His inability to use his left foot, i think he would be much more comfortable on the right. he does use his left foot. you think maldini, lahm etc would be more comfortable on the right. i'm not saying he is or isn't this or that just the idea of ' he's right footed so should play on the right ' is s****. Lahm can tackle with his left, so could Maldini, Santon cant do that. He will always look to tackle with his right, which leaves him exposed and vulnerable when the man goes to the byline.... You cant use Maldini's ability as reasoning for playing him LB. can't really remember anyone going past santon on the outside when he hasn't been done for positioning (more naive than owt else) Off the top of my head, downing did. whats he doing over there, the left footed downing ? Playing on the right, going down santons left.....

Plays RB for the italian U-21's, cant comment on italy seniors.

What was he saying?

Based on what? His inability to use his left foot, i think he would be much more comfortable on the right. he does use his left foot. you think maldini, lahm etc would be more comfortable on the right. i'm not saying he is or isn't this or that just the idea of ' he's right footed so should play on the right ' is s****. Lahm can tackle with his left, so could Maldini, Santon cant do that. He will always look to tackle with his right, which leaves him exposed and vulnerable when the man goes to the byline.... You cant use Maldini's ability as reasoning for playing him LB. can't really remember anyone going past santon on the outside when he hasn't been done for positioning (more naive than owt else) Off the top of my head, downing did.

Dont use Maldini and Lahm as proof for Santon's capacity to play at LB. That logic is flawed.

Based on what? His inability to use his left foot, i think he would be much more comfortable on the right. he does use his left foot. you think maldini, lahm etc would be more comfortable on the right. i'm not saying he is or isn't this or that just the idea of ' he's right footed so should play on the right ' is s****. Lahm can tackle with his left, so could Maldini, Santon cant do that. He will always look to tackle with his right, which leaves him exposed and vulnerable when the man goes to the byline.... You cant use Maldini's ability as reasoning for playing him LB.

Based on what? His inability to use his left foot, i think he would be much more comfortable on the right.

He is a RB. Not a LB.

Left out, wont be coming here.

If they were to get knocked out in the group, when would he be back?

cannot wait.

I am still not sure why he switched from the 4-3-3 that worked so well first half. Gutierrez is definitely better in the middle.

He is a good motivator, but tactically, he is one dimensional.

Why in gods name did we shift from the brilliantly effective midfield 3, where jonas was outstanding, to hoofball shite, removing jonas from the game?

Pardew want us to show ameobi more love! Fuck off man.

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

Well said.