duo

2 hours ago, Kaizero said:

 

This is  just a straight up lie. Correct decisions are up 12% on average across a season, that means VAR is ensuring that the players on the pitch and what they do are what decide who wins the league and who gets relegatated and not a shit referee.

 

Who deems when a correct decision was made? Referees? very easy to paint a picture as to how you want it to be perceived.

3 hours ago, Stifler said:

He’s not surviving that.

I thought he would go at the end of the season, but I think that’s it now. He wants out, Spurs want him out, that’s him saying ‘Here is your opportunity to push me’.

I hope they don't sack him - it is a great watch ha

Some great results for us this weekend

No way Chelsea can justify spending more money if they don't get into CL

Chelsea are a terrible team - how much they spent?

Back to reality for Burnley it sounds 

VAR = find an excuse not to give a goal

Is it ft

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/football/64995055

Personally I think he's spot on.  They had a good manager in Vieira who I think would 'given time' have built something there.

They need to clearly define clear and obvious as the refs currently seem clueless. There should be a tolerance -

• someone being offside by a mm isn't getting any advantage - so if the offside isn't 'obvious' i.e. can be clearly seen and isn't subjective i.e. trying to figure out where their toe is - they are NOT offside.
• If a reply has to be watched numerous times from multiple angles to check for a foul or pen - it isn't 'clear and 'obvious'.

VAR is just ruining the game in it's current form and refs need to be re-educated as to how it needs to be applied.  Because atm they are deciding who wins the league and who gets relegated not the 11 players on the pitch.

We're gonna make the top 4 - can feel it in my gut.

5 hours ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Our first goal could have been chalked off too for Willocks foul in the build up, again a subjective decision. We got lucky with that (although it didn't feel like it given the decisions up to that point) so it's not like it was a blatantly bent game or anything. Just shit.

 

 

EDIT:

 

Added to here as the triple post made me look unhinged.

 

 

 

 

It's not even subjective either, by the conditions Neville brings up Felipe cannot be adjudged to not be in control, he literally ticks every box for the criteria they're looking for with the exception that the ball was moving quickly.

 

 

 

Proof the refs in this league are incompetent

49 minutes ago, astraguy said:

 how are man u 90% 

unconcious bias

1 minute ago, LV said:

I think we’ll get our revenge on Man U at home. 

If we beat Man U the momentum is ours - BRING IT ON !!

59 minutes ago, Adam said:

 

How tiny is that dressing room

2 Goals

5 Shots

20 Sprints

9 Touches in opp. box

5 Dribbles

4 Clearances

Football is a funny old game.  I am proper buzzing - such a big result. 

Are people seriously questioning Botman here?  The man is a colossus - I love him. 

Just now, Willow said:

Would anyone try Anderson starting for ASM now?

Yes - ASM hasn't done nearly enough.  On current form I'd sell in the summer and re-invest the money.

3 minutes ago, MrRaspberryJam said:

Just look at it man. Like butter wouldn't melt and then shushes Navas and the fans. 

 

 

The composure for that pen - awesome 

Win against Man U and it's looking good.  Bring on Sunday - cannot wait.  No Casemiro as well. 

He's human - he made a mistake.  This lad is pure quality.

I am still drooling over the foot work before the cross to Anderson 

Thank you Ekitike for turning us down