sbnufc

A woman in a high position knew everything, saw all the evidence. The club can't hide behind her, surely. If she's at fault therefore the club are at fault. No ideas about laws etc but surely this is more than just morally wrong. So what if she/they did? They were under no obligation from anyone not to play him. Was their choice, regardless of it being "wrong"

Got grief for this yesterday. But are we sure the club haven't broken any laws? It's getting worse by the day. Surely it'd be the police who have legal responsibility to stop him from playing? And they obviously didnt see it necessary

"Defence case will continue after lunch." Guess not

poor lad

http://www.101greatgoals.com/blog/sunderland-fans-call-margaret-byrne-resign-following-adam-johnson-revelations/

fuuuuuuuuuucking hell

Wasn't there something like "that wasn't so bad, was it?" after the second meeting? Sure, it could mean the kiss, but sounds like there's more than that to me. and "you felt very turned on http://i.imgur.com/TiGxl8P.png"

Ok, these messages would make me lean towards guilty

"further" ? Does that imply there was some, or is that just me?

She said he was shaved down there, he claims he wasnt. I assume pics show he was - the pics are from around that time apparently

Great way to start the day

Nah. They've acted very wrong morally, but nothing more than that. Aye, people thinking Sunderland will face anything from the FA are clutching at straws like. He was available to play, so they played him. If he was that big of a risk, the police would have stopped it for a start Not like he'll be scouring the north east for kids under 10

Got mine too

I just think we'd be better off with humans that are qualified and experienced in making reasoned interpretations determining the most serious criminal cases, rather than randoms off the street. That'll be RTG's excuse then, "It was just a jury of Humans and they could be wrong, nee one reelly knaas wot happened marra" "Bet at least one of 'em was a mag!"

Plymouth plz

They stayed in the Prem, that's all that matters

He told the police about the kiss in his interview. He told the club about "it all", which I assume is the kiss as well. They didnt withhold any info.

This is what I've been asking for days. Suppose the jury must just decide who to side with in all these paedophile cases where the only witness is the victim... I honestly don't know. Yeah, while I reckon he probably did have a feel, even with that I wouldnt be sure 100% Can he get time for the other two things he pleaded guilty for? Reckon after all this we might see him with community service and a fine(?)

How can the jury be sure "beyond all doubt" (or whatever the quote is) to give a guilty verdict? I mean, I'm not and I dont see how I would be even if I was in the courtroom throughout the trial. There's literally no evidence. Surely he'll be found not guilty?