Geordie_once_removed
-
Posts
324 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Geordie_once_removed
-
-
53 minutes ago, STM said:
It was a foul in the box. It's a pen, it's always been a pen.
Brentford were dirty cunts and got what they deserved.
Agree this this. Overall they got what they deserved
-
The problem is not with the player or the referee. It's the rule. It's clearly a foul even if you might argue Gordon did draw it. But the foul and the position it was in in no way justify a free kick at goal from 12 yards. At best Gordon keeps the ball in play and is able to make his way towards the corner flag and maybe send in a cross. A penalty is just not a proportionate response to a foul that prevents that.
I'd like two degrees of foul in the penalty area. One results in a traditional penalty. The other in an ice hockey style penalty.
-
17 hours ago, Lush Vlad said:
Finally got round to starting this. That first episode was a tough watch at times. Pure PR stuff for the owners and Staveley looked like a psychopath nodding along like a loon when Yasir was giving an awful speech to the squad.
Certainly picked up towards the end, mind and looking forward to the rest of it. As I’ve heard it picks up and doesn’t feel so much like a propaganda piece.
I had a very similar reaction to the first episode. If the goal was to build us global support I think it would have backfired as to my eyes it made us look like exactly what many of our critics call us, a shill for a repressive state.
I've seen episodes 2 and 3 and while clearly more enjoyable, mainly as the focus shifts more to the players and fans and emphasizes what makes the club special more effectively, neither has set my world alight. I'll finish it but for me its not essential watching.
-
Just to add an extra little kick in the nuts from yesterday. I benched Ferguson for Isak in my fantasy team. Feck.
-
If that is real that is a good order to the games. I want us to play at home for the final group game and PSG stepping into a rocking St James' for the first home game is good as a result there could give us some great momentum.
-
I live in Düsseldorf so this is the dream draw. I'm for sure going to try to get tickets for the game there, if nothing else I'll be in the city for the game. Any tips for getting tickets are very welcome.
-
29 minutes ago, Stifler said:
This Liverpool fan in particular is taking it hard.
https://x.com/joshuagibson88/status/1697302067696513231?s=46&t=VdH0aGHsHSF2_7GgShF1MQ
https://x.com/joshuagibson88/status/1695833885257416710?s=46&t=VdH0aGHsHSF2_7GgShF1MQ
https://x.com/joshuagibson88/status/1697305061007700128?s=46&t=VdH0aGHsHSF2_7GgShF1MQ
What an absolute weapon.
-
-
14 hours ago, toon25 said:
Tom 'full of enthusiasm' Davies.
![[emoji38]](https://newcastle-online.org/uploads/emoticons/icon_lol.gif.1b62175611aad28ce856dc77d6ebbdc5.gif "[emoji38]")
0.45 in.
Jesus how old is he? I had in my head he was around 25 but he looks like the guy who used to hang around Huddersfield bus station, with an unbro bag full of porn mags and drinking Special Brew.
-
1 minute ago, PauloGeordio said:
Well I flip that on its head and say that’s why we win today! Their defence isn’t good, ours is. We have a point to prove after City, we are at home. We are United!
I would be very happy if you're right and I'm wrong!
-
American owners trying to fundamentally destroy the football pyramid and state owners buying clubs as part of wider geopolitical goals are both clearly bad for football as we know it.
We get more flack than others, and as a fan group we're often placed in an impossible position where we are told we have to stop doing something that has run in our families for generations and if we don't and we actually enjoy a 'product' that is immeasurably better than anything we've seen in 20 plus there is blood on our hands. But let's not pretend that none of the criticism of the owners is valid.
-
Not confident. They have a bit of a hoodoo over us and Klopp will have them right up for the game. Overall I feel over the season, perhaps with a bit of heart over head, we'll finish above them. We're a better balanced team and Klopp's ravings, while they might help them win games like this, aren't the key to sustained success especially not when compared to Howe and Co's studied and constant drive for excellence.
-
7 hours ago, black_n_white said:
Watching some of the highlights from our last season, I’m struggling to believe we can get anywhere near that this season. Some of our performances, goals and wins were unbelievable. Someone change my mind please!
Pretty easy that. Remember the start of the season where we drew a number of games and lost others unluckily, De Bryune's eye of a needle pass for City to equalise and Isak's offside goal and the extra, extra, extra time winner for Liverpool stand out for example. Also the January to March period where we just couldn't score. A rub of the green here, a bit more quality there from new signings/players getting better and we win those games. I also think we hit the bar and post more than any other team.
-
2 hours ago, Manxst said:
Or even well over. We were at around 95% in the last published figures. We’ve only gone and added a lot of quality players on top of that, without being able to get rid of many. New sponsors will help, of course, but I reckon we’re still right up there.
Wasn't that as we had to pay huge fees to get rid of Bruce. A final parting gift if the Ashley era.
-
4 hours ago, timeEd32 said:
It's a good purchase but that price is right at the edge of reasonable IMO. If we're paying slightly more to avoid any buy-back or sell-on clauses then I'm even happier.
I wonder if we're paying more to avoid this as well as get it as a loan with obligation to buy which helps us sting in late for a RCB.
-
Caicedo at that price can never be class as a great signing. Even in this market it feels £50 million over priced. That fee impacts their ability to strengthen elsewhere, something they need to do if they are to match their ambitions and given that their team still looks unbalanced. Signings are only 'great' when all the pieces fall into place which with this one I don't think they do.
I would argue he's semi proven at this stage, in that he has done well, not for that long, in a team that is well coached and has a specific style of play that suits him. You can't be sure how this will translate. He's also never played in the Champions League, so at that level he is firmly unproven.
-
4 minutes ago, Smal said:
eh? He's ran this game
My 2p's worth is that he has been good under pressure and breaking up the odd bit of play, but I've not seen much creativity from him.
-
How did Carlos look? Been curious about how he'd do in the Prem after he almost signed for us.
-
30 minutes ago, gbandit said:
Just love the tracking back work he does, seeing him pop up absolutely anywhere on the pitch dispossessing people is a joy to watch. Other teams must hate him like they hate Joelinton
No one can hate Miggy, he's just so lovable.
-
Willock, Anderson and Murphy have to be considered as at least decent "in an emergency" options for a wide forward/winger on either side. All of them would be 3 choice of lower for either wing (maybe not Anderson as we're not sure what will come from him). Because of this I'm pretty sure were not actively looking at wingers and I think that is the right approach. Next summer with Miggy one year older and other positions addressed we can spaff a load of money at a "wow" signing on the RW. We're just not able to do that right now.
-
46 minutes ago, ste_ne24 said:
I can't watch highlight videos like this, they make me feel like I'm having a seizure.
-
While I wasn't opposed to the signing I wasn't particularly excited but the penny has dropped for me. Howe and team are signing players not just to have two strong 11s but also the ability to play 3 or 4 different ways and Barnes seems to fit this strategy really well. For us and our needs I think we got the right relegated Leicester player even if Maddison might be the more talented player overall.
-
9 minutes ago, Nucasol said:
The whole “Daniel Levy-Shrewd Operator” thing has lost a lot of gloss. He got absolutely ridden roughshod by both Mourinho and Conte and his treatment of Kane would make me think twice if I was a player potentially looking to join them.
Agreed. It seems such a small time attitude and lacking faith in yourself and the set up you have created. Rather than backing yourself to adapt and grow with the money it brings in, he's determined to hang on to the diamond that fell into his lap at all costs. Even City let players go at the right price and when circumstances merit it.
I know ASM isn't Kane but I think how Newcastle's leadership approached his leaving verses Spurs and Kane just shows a more mature and ultimately ambitious structure is being put in place at Newcastle. I think we'd act the same for Bruno, Isak et all. We'd have our price but we'd let them go and would have pre selected 4/5 potential players that would help us continue to grow.
The only thing I can think of in Levy's defence is he might have been burned by how they squandered the money the sale of the last world class player they had (Bale) brought in. Still a bit of a small time attitude.
-
I think it will be a similar team and system to the one that ended the season. So Tonali won't start. A big factor behind him being the No 1 target I think is that he will allow for a wider variety of tactical changes/system to be applied before and during games. I see him playing this off the bench game changing role in this game.
AC Milan vs Newcastle United 19/09/23 @ 17:45 (TNT Sports)
in Football
Posted
Agree except I'd keep Barnes and Gordon on the wing. Almiron would terrorise a tiring Italian defence so could helps us get something, but he's also great from closing out a game in a positive way with his pressing in case we're in front.