nufc123

Think so

I know. If we leave Longstaff out of the discussion, my point was more we cant have Tonali sitting on the bench (and yes I know you said we can )

Did fine/good against Liverpool, Villa, PSG, City, Everton, Brighton (this season). Almost half of Tonalis games that. We have very little data on Tonali.

I was not thinking about Hall at all. The point was, it doesnt have to be perfect (or cant get better re Burn) just because we are winning.

Was thinking more of...we were winning but we all knew/saw it was not perfect.

Feels a little bit like Burn at LB scenario

I know. This is not me wanting Longstaff out, but we cant have Tonali sitting on the bench when he is dominating everytime he goes away on international duty (was well up for it against City, Brighton, Chelsea and Everton also).

Think this Tonali vs Longstaff vs points is a little bit unfair. Not been starting many games for us.

Not seen one person in here who thinks that. But if you search up the trolls on different fan bases, they will say anything between 40-60m.

80m is a lot of money, but if we only made 17m profit on one of the best players we have had, thats very underwhelming.

But £80m isn't an "insult," it's an enormous transfer fee and a decent profit on what we paid. Okey sorry, but its not a decent profit either. What is the profit? 17m?

Decent offer was said on the last page. 80m is a terrible deal

I dont think anyone knows we paid 60m for him . See a lot of twitter trolls saying 50-60m will get the deal done.

The problem has never been that Tonall cant play with them.

A load of waffle. We were poor against Southampton, Fulham, Wolves. Should have won against Everton and Brighton. All a little mix of Longstaff and Tonali switching. Its not because of one player cant play with certain players.