Jump to content

Choppy Chop Chop

Member
  • Posts

    1,003
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Choppy Chop Chop

  1. South Shields FC @SouthShieldsFC · 5h Earlier today, an individual claiming to represent SSFC was featured on @LBC and expressed reprehensible views about the Black Lives Matter movement. This disgusting person in fact has no connection to the Club. Statement: https://southshieldsfc.co.uk/club-statement-10/
  2. Ironically had Labour been in power the deal would likely be dead and massive potential investment in our area along with it. You don't know that, ironically or not
  3. I'm confused. Has a post been deleted that this refers to because you've quoted yourself? Either way, I think this is the umpteenth time that there's been supposed intel from a player so you've set yourself up if you've come in here to claim the same. Sorry this was was a quote from Steve Giocoechea, I don't even know who lives next door to me
  4. Check my account mate, I've got no history of making shit up especially a piss take ITK account. I'm far to busy and have a life to be fucking around, Obviously I can't name the information came from but alls I say is it's today's talk in the players what's app group.
  5. I'm pretty sure he is wrong. Judicial review is only available of decisions made by public bodies. It is well established in case law that sports governing bodies are not judicially reviewable. See R -v- Football Association Ltd, ex parte Football League Ltd [1992] 2 All 833 And: https://www.ashurst.com/en/news-and-insights/legal-updates/judicial-review/ "The following characteristics have been considered relevant to whether an act or function can be reviewed. The "but for" test: in other words, whether, but for the existence of a non-statutory body, the functions exercised by such body would inevitably be regulated by statute. Bodies which have been considered amenable to judicial review using this test include the Advertising Standards Authority2 and the Takeover Panel3. However, the Football Association's decisions escaped review as the court held that if the Football Association did not exist, the state would not have found it necessary to perform its functions4." I may be wrong - but there's lot of reading out there on this - or may be thinking of a different judicial mechanism. Don't know who is right but if you are Greg, then could the PL just turn round and go - takeover denied because......well we can't be arsed with the hassle? Or we don't like NUFC as we love Sunderland....... and PIF wouldn't be able to legally challenge. Seems ridiculous if true The PL do seem to have it in for us TBH, if they do turn it down the court battle should be quite entertaining Nothing about this sorry saga is entertaining
  6. Well I'm positive my optimism will roll over until tomorrow or the day after or the day after that
  7. BREAKING: Fresh doubt poured over Newcastle takeover deal. It’s understood that Mohammed Bin Salman illegally torrented 3 seasons of RuPaul’s Drag Race and is using his brothers Netflix account. This made me laugh Jack Shearing on Twitter
  8. "I knew about this bid first before anyone else so I dont know why people don't want Mauriss" Of all the bullshit floating around Mr Edwards wins the award for being the biggest shit stirrer, hope I have the pleasure of blocking him after all this is sorted one way or another
  9. I honestly think they won't make a decision once the season restarts. So tomorrow or end of season for me. [/quote Thats insane]
  10. But we don't care, we are Geordies we are Geordies super Geordies from the toon :frantic:
  11. But we don't care, we are Geordies super Geordies from the toon :frantic:
  12. Absolutely. Although it won’t be called champagne. I'd like nothing better than a Jack Daniels or a good Malt but doctors orders forbid it so Champagne it will be, never liked beer out of a can. Could murder a pint of scotch
  13. This latest bit of 'fake news' has certainly caused a lot of concern and upset on this forum. The inevitable approval of the takeover is not far away now, and the more "rubbish" that is invented and quoted as fact by reporters, the more certain I remain of approval happening . . and SOON. From the main thread Manorpark
  14. It's supposed to be a positive thread I didn't say where the bottle was yesterday ;)
  15. Well Champagne back in the fridge for tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...