-
Posts
258 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by gasman
-
Paul sounds good to me
-
True, but he's only getting those questions so much because Staveley told him she was gonna pass the test imminently, nearly 3 weeks ago now. So he should be annoyed at her surely There is no definitive proof that Staveley is his source or that he does even have a source It's just about obvious that she is, she's done an interview for him previously. My biggest concern with Caulkin is that his source previously led him down the garden path with the BZG deal which george nicely described afterwards as 'bollocks from the start'. If a source has previously given information which turns out to be false or incorrect I would not be so quick to use any future information from them Eh? Didnt Caulkin pretty much dampen that one from day one. He was fairly consistent. Also, it's not the same source FFS. Its clear AS is confident. Whether she should be is a different story entirely. Which is why I agree that Staveley may not be his source. It is not an assault on Georges character. Im just making the point that no resepcted journalist would rely on a poor source
-
True, but he's only getting those questions so much because Staveley told him she was gonna pass the test imminently, nearly 3 weeks ago now. So he should be annoyed at her surely There is no definitive proof that Staveley is his source or that he does even have a source It's just about obvious that she is, she's done an interview for him previously. My biggest concern with Caulkin is that his source previously led him down the garden path with the BZG deal which george nicely described afterwards as 'bollocks from the start'. If a source has previously given information which turns out to be false or incorrect I would not be so quick to use any future information from them
-
True, but he's only getting those questions so much because Staveley told him she was gonna pass the test imminently, nearly 3 weeks ago now. So he should be annoyed at her surely There is no definitive proof that Staveley is his source or that he does even have a source
-
https://twitter.com/MoneyMikeAshley/status/1261185889889329155?s=19
-
If this was going seriously pear shaped mike would have opened his trap by now
-
7 hours of sleep how dare
-
They have got to go to Middlesbrough
-
So, just the open letter to throw in to a skip and then the transfer of funds. Then we just have to wait for lee to post the keys on his bike
-
the long anticipated gifs will be more like Dicanio pushing alcock over
-
I will apologise to Mrs Bishop for wanting all these new players and training facilities
-
This is remininscent of when Harold from eastenders vanished only to return at a later date
-
Spy just say you reckon its okay he got killed and lets get on with it Its got absolutely nothing to do with the putchase of nufc. Full stop
-
If I didn't despise our current owner so much, I wouldn't want this to happen tbh. I'm quite uncomfortable with it. I'm very confortable with it as it happens. If someone wants to carry on with mike then that's their own decision but opinions shouldn't be forced on to others. After all this is a football forum and not a human rights forum or mumsnet. What does that even mean? Self explanatory isn't it? Who is forcing their opinion on you? Did you bother to read the open letter? "Forcing your opinion" = Woman who's husband was allegedly brutally murdered by our prospective new owners. I think she's well within her rights to be p*ssed off about that and shout it far and wide, whether you want to hear it or not. As disgusting it might be to murder an ememy countries spy I do believe in justice. That does not mean that I do not want any funding for my favourite football team from said country.
-
If I didn't despise our current owner so much, I wouldn't want this to happen tbh. I'm quite uncomfortable with it. I'm very confortable with it as it happens. If someone wants to carry on with mike then that's their own decision but opinions shouldn't be forced on to others. After all this is a football forum and not a human rights forum or mumsnet. We’ve never been stuck with Mike, ever. People don’t have to turn up, they chose to. That’s on them. Thanks for that Lee it's absolutely true though. He gave away tickets this season as he was bricking it. No one is forcing fans to turn up. Empty stadium week after week and hes gone. Simple as that really. If you live close to the stadium and someone gives you a free ticket for you to come down and watch Bruce's boys then you might well do so!
-
If I didn't despise our current owner so much, I wouldn't want this to happen tbh. I'm quite uncomfortable with it. I'm very confortable with it as it happens. If someone wants to carry on with mike then that's their own decision but opinions shouldn't be forced on to others. After all this is a football forum and not a human rights forum or mumsnet. What does that even mean? Self explanatory isn't it? Who is forcing their opinion on you? Did you bother to read the open letter?
-
If I didn't despise our current owner so much, I wouldn't want this to happen tbh. I'm quite uncomfortable with it. I'm very confortable with it as it happens. If someone wants to carry on with mike then that's their own decision but opinions shouldn't be forced on to others. After all this is a football forum and not a human rights forum or mumsnet. We’ve never been stuck with Mike, ever. People don’t have to turn up, they chose to. That’s on them. Thanks for that Lee
-
If I didn't despise our current owner so much, I wouldn't want this to happen tbh. I'm quite uncomfortable with it. I'm very confortable with it as it happens. If someone wants to carry on with mike then that's their own decision but opinions shouldn't be forced on to others. After all this is a football forum and not a human rights forum or mumsnet. What does that even mean? Self explanatory isn't it?
-
If I didn't despise our current owner so much, I wouldn't want this to happen tbh. I'm quite uncomfortable with it. I'm very confortable with it as it happens. If someone wants to carry on with mike then that's their own decision but opinions shouldn't be forced on to others. After all this is a football forum and not a human rights forum or mumsnet.
-
Anyone who doesnt want this deal needs their own head subtracting
-
Why should i just take away nufc 'bias'?
-
f*** it then we'll carry on with mike
-
Arsenal, chelsea, liverpool, manchester city, tottenham hotspur and wolves must all have sent letters in though