Mark Hughes, Martin Jol or Harry Redknapp ?

[Dave]

Of the three I'd prefer Hughes.

[Tooj]

None of them

 

Hughes looked great at first with Wales and Blackburn but he seems to run out of ideas after a while

 

Jol is seemingly untested in the transfer market with others at Spurs making the transfer decisions, tactically he's OK but nothing great - I don't remember him pulling off any unforeseen victories against the top teams

 

'arry has always done OK with teams but he's never managed to get a team consistently into the top 6

 

Hi Joel.

 

[mozy]

hughes - we need someone experienced, who doesn't need to "test" certain tactics or formations. Hughes will be a great manager but he isnt right for us at the moment

jol - if you speak to any spurs fan they say the same thing. great guy, poor manager. you may say he got spurs into 5th but he spent best part of 100million. jol would fail here, guaranteed. not tactically aware.

redknapp - the best of the three which isn't saying much. agree with most on here that the appointment reeks of similarity to allardyce. the positives i have of harry are that everyone who has played under him seems to hold him in the highest regard and tell how tactically aware he is, as well as his trademark bargain buys.

 

Go for a foreigner!

[Geordie Boot Boy]

I don't rate Jol at all and it's interesting to see that the two Spurs lads have both expressed negative opinions of him too.