Guest optimistic nit Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 I know we probably dont need another thread on the subject but i've just seen an interview of favio briatolli (sp) on SSN (as i assume have a lot of you) where he freely admits it is not ian dowie their manager who signs the players or chooses who to sign. i was woundering what everyone's thoughts on this are, considering this is exactly what everyone's problem with mike ashley is. is he wrong, or is he right and we are wrong, or are we both right? i'd also like to point out for those saying that this club is fucked up (which it is in a lot of ways to be fair) because of this keegan thing, what do you expect? if you have a club like this, where the fans will turn on the board when one manager resigns because he doesn't like the system, then its going to fuck this club up. do the majority of fans want keegan back? yes, if they don't get this, then will potentially fuck this club up in the long term? yes. ashley bringing keegan back may be the only way to placate the fans, although even that may not work. if we dont want a club thats so screwed then we cant lose our minds when this happens, but then the way we treat the people who do well for this club is what makes it so remarkable in the first place. our situation is actually better than west ham's situation in my view. keegan fell our over the loaning of nacho and potential sales of barton and smith, and possibly the sale of milner in my view, whereas curbs lost 2 first teamers, signed a lot less players and to say every player at west ham has a price is much more correct than to say every toon player has a price. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 Briatori said the other week that he doesn't even trust the bank manager with his money, never mind a club manager. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest optimistic nit Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 bump, now the pre match bickering is over (i hope). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 As has been said before, how can a chairman/owner ever sack a manager when the team arent getting results. Cant ever be good for long term stability having a situation like this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now