Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Agree, but we definitely overpaid given what he has shown at Everton. 
 

 

When you pay for a player of his age, you don’t pay for his current ability. You pay for his potential. I am personally unsure of how much further he can develop, but I guess Howe saw that he can still improve, hence the fees. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Solitude20 said:

When you pay for a player of his age, you don’t pay for his current ability. You pay for his potential. I am personally unsure of how much further he can develop, but I guess Howe saw that he can still improve, hence the fees. 

Yeah I’m fully aware of that we still overpaid. He was t pulling up trees at Everton and as an offensive player his numbers are lacking. 
 

that being said, I hope he comes good. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Mahoneys Tache said:

Speed and Lee kept that level

of performance up well into their 30’s and fitness and nutrition are much better now. 

 

Agreed. Milner is another example.

 

My only minor counterpoint is that the demands on JWP under Howe's counter-pressing system will be higher than those on Speed and Lee. JWP has consistently covered the highest distance in the premier league in the last few years. So the miles on his body has been way higher than other players. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some interesting developments at LFC. FSG had put the club for sale earlier this season. When the original club was up for sale was announced, our CEO Mike Gordon announced his departure.  Members of our background team had also indicated they wanted to leave.

 

John Henry has backtracked and said they are now only looking for minor investment partners. All of a sudden, Mike Gordon announced his return. Gordon, Edwards, and Klopp were the original transfer committee trifecta. Now the rumors are most of our analytics and scouting team will remain. Our DOF, Julian Ward, will leave after this summer transfer window. We are looking for a new DOF. Some unconfirmed rumors of Michael Edwards returning. Strong links in the media to Markus Krosche, current DOF of E. Frankfurt and former Leipzig sporting director.  A lot of positive news and rumors about our background setup this week. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, 54 said:

For what it's worth, I can understand why someone like Howe would like a player like McTominay, he's someone who is similar to Longstaff, a work horse who can be the link between defense and attack.

 

@Froggycould probably tell say more, but I'd imagine he'd be an upgrade on Longstaff, even if that is just quicker passing and better shooting ability.

 

I think he'd be uninspiring, and that we could do better, but I get it.

 

He's better than people give him credit for but the only thing he's really going to improve for you is depth. That being said, £25m will do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

He's better than people give him credit for but the only thing he's really going to improve for you is depth. That being said, £25m will do.

 

If we're looking to be competing with Man Utd, we shouldn't be buying players that they have already deemed to be not good enough

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ikri said:

 

If we're looking to be competing with Man Utd, we shouldn't be buying players that they have already deemed to be not good enough

 

Well I would agree, but I think you're still a year or two away from that so he's not a bad signing for depth. He will still play plenty of minutes for us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very confident about Gordon. As others have said, he's a bit restricted at the moment because Burn struggles to support him, but it looks like we're aiming to bring in a new LB for next season. He's a player that can make things happen.

 

I'm prepared to trust Eddie on McTominay. We don't have a DM so he'd be a good option to have, and he comes with Premiership experience. He's good enough on the technical side not to be a liability in that position. 

 

Both players have been with clubs in turmoil, so their more recent performances have to be seen in that light.

 

And finally our business model means that, for the time being, we won't be competing for the players that the big six want.

 

 

Edited by Cronky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Said it before he signed but I see a lot of James Milner when he was here in him. He's got ability and the work rate, hopefully Howe is his Martin O'Neill and gets the best from him. The way he plays and from the attributes he has, I wouldn't be surprised if like Milner it turns out he's better more central, could mould him into that more advanced of the midfield 3 imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

Said it before he signed but I see a lot of James Milner when he was here in him. He's got ability and the work rate, hopefully Howe is his Martin O'Neill and gets the best from him. The way he plays and from the attributes he has, I wouldn't be surprised if like Milner it turns out he's better more central, could mould him into that more advanced of the midfield 3 imo.

 

I'd compare Gordon with Bellamy, particularly on the issue of pace and work rate. It's interesting that both players left their previous clubs under a cloud, apparently for failing to lift a struggling team. There also seems to be something a bit chippy about their personalities. As with Bellamy, I'd like to see him given a freer role, and more responsibility. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cronky said:

 

I'd compare Gordon with Bellamy, particularly on the issue of pace and work rate. It's interesting that both players left their previous clubs under a cloud, apparently for failing to lift a struggling team. There also seems to be something a bit chippy about their personalities. As with Bellamy, I'd like to see him given a freer role, and more responsibility. 

Both players who had iron wills to develop themselves and became more adept as their careers went on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, teohgk said:

I dont rate McTominay at all, and i don’t like this signing, but i would support the transfer whole heartedly if that’s the player Howe want.

 

Why?

 

Not being an arse but I genuinely don't understand this view.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bada Bing said:

 

Why?

 

Not being an arse but I genuinely don't understand this view.

Just showing faith and support, I guess. The trick is to realise when that loyalty isn't being repaid. But giving no slack at all will get us nowhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s hard to get away from the fact that if we sign him then ETH obviously doesn’t rate him and we’re giving manure wedge to strengthen the position. This is obviously coupled with most people’s own opinion that he’s bang average.

 

It’s probably all paper talk nonsense anyway. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, 80 said:

Just showing faith and support, I guess. The trick is to realise when that loyalty isn't being repaid. But giving no slack at all will get us nowhere.

 

OK fair enough. 

 

My thoughts are:
 

1) We would be financially strengthening a rival club by taking a player, that in my view, gives them an easy opportunity to strengthen an important position. 

2) Does the signing of McT match the ownerships stated ambitions for where they want this club to be going forward (champions league position)?

3) We obviously don't have all the background data / analytics, but the good old eye test would suggest he is bang average. 

4) Is it likely we'd sell him at a profit, if we signed him for £30m - £40m? I'm not sure.

 

I have reservation on all these points, so I'm hoping Howe get rebuffed if he genuinely is pursuing this lad. Which I would add is all conjecture at this point.

 

We need to do better than McT if we are serious about progressing. Howe will eventually need to get used to managing higher profile players if he is to take us forward anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BoSelecta said:

It’s hard to get away from the fact that if we sign him then ETH obviously doesn’t rate him and we’re giving manure wedge to strengthen the position. This is obviously coupled with most people’s own opinion that he’s bang average.

 

It’s probably all paper talk nonsense anyway. 

 

ETH spunked nearly £100m on Antony tbf. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bada Bing said:

 

OK fair enough. 

 

My thoughts are:
 

1) We would be financially strengthening a rival club by taking a player, that in my view, gives them an easy opportunity to strengthen an important position. 

2) Does the signing of McT match the ownerships stated ambitions for where they want this club to be going forward (champions league position)?

3) We obviously don't have all the background data / analytics, but the good old eye test would suggest he is bang average. 

4) Is it likely we'd sell him at a profit, if we signed him for £30m - £40m? I'm not sure.

 

I have reservation on all these points, so I'm hoping Howe get rebuffed if he genuinely is pursuing this lad. Which I would add is all conjecture at this point.

 

We need to do better than McT if we are serious about progressing. Howe will eventually need to get used to managing higher profile players if he is to take us forward anyway.

I do agree with your main points by the way. I don't want to get religious about it, but point 1 is maybe the biggest - I want as little to do with those clubs as possible. They don't want to do anything that will help us, and we should give them as little financial benefit as possible.

 

The rumours are Eddie Howe feels similarly though, which is another reason why I'm not stressing too much about this possible deal, though.

 

 

Edited by 80

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...