Ranking our Squad - 13 Targett

[54]

Solid D, think he could be a solid addition for a team in the lower reaches of the league, say an Ipswich or a Burnley if they come up. 

 

He's a pure, 7 out of 10 player, that has no thrills but also has no clangers.

[Geogaddi]

Surprised people are being as generous as a D when it comes to Taggart, especially when you consider Wilson got an E. Taggart is an obvious E , he was ok three years ago but since then has literally done nothing and when he has played looks slow, lethargic and unfit.

[Dandy Man]

Small D for Matty T.

 

Difference between him and Wilson is that I could easily see Targett turning out another 3-4 seasons for some lower table PL team, Wilson I can barely see turning out another 3-4 games. Also Wilson has declined a lot more from a higher starting point whereas Targett has more gone from being quite good to bang average.

 

 

Edited 5 hours ago by Dandy Man

[Geogaddi]

57 minutes ago, Dandy Man said:

Small D for Matty T.

 

Difference between him and Wilson is that I could easily see Targett turning out another 3-4 seasons for some lower table PL team, Wilson I can barely see turning out another 3-4 games. Also Wilson has declined a lot more from a higher starting point whereas Targett has more gone from being quite good to bang average.

 

 

 

I actually think the opposite , I reckon Wilson will do more over the next few seasons than Targett . I reckon if you asked some of the top end championship clubs which player they would rather take now it would be Wilson.  It's such a daft debate anyway really as they are both well past their best.

 

 

Edited 4 hours ago by Geogaddi