iklgizmo Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 didnt realise he was available on a free in the summer. Although im pretty sure roeder wouldnt like him cos he seems to have a bit ov an attitude, i would take him on a free, even if it was just to replace sib Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 Aye, on a free maybe. He's got potential. However, i don't think we need any MORE stikers, and Roeder's already said he is staying. Next season, we'll have 5 strikers in the squad. Martins, Owen, Dyer, Ameobi, Sibierski. It would be a waste of time, effort and money going after another when we won't need one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 I would take him on a free, Owen and Dyer are injury prone and Sibierski is going to be even older and possibly slower! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nufc 4 life Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 we've been linked with crouch and babel sibierski probably won't be here owen is a target for injuries and ameobi isn't world class i doubt we won't bring in any new strikers TBH Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 I would take him on a free, Owen and Dyer are injury prone and Sibierski is going to be even older and possibly slower! Hmm... you're probably right. Someone on a free would be good though. Not worth going and paying £5/6/7m on a striker when we don't need someone like that. Even though it would be so typical. But if we're talking frees, i'd rather have Viduka. Anyhow, i'd rather we made Giles Barnes a major target in the summer, for £2/3m or so. He can play upfront... but he's also mega versatile across the midfield. Plus' he's gonna be ace. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 Barnes would be useful as he wouldn't be chucked straight on the bench as soon as our main strikers are fit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 Indeed, and considering our recent injury record, he'd be in the team every other week. Right-wing, left-wing, centre-mid, upfront. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 I'd take him and release Sibierski. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tisd09 Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 I think we have bigger fish to fry. By the sounds of what Roeder is saying that we will be back in for Babel and theres the possibility of Crouch, I would be very happy with Owen, Martins, Crouch, Babel and Shola. Now that is a good squad of strikers. However I think Pool would be mad to sell Peter Crouch I think he offers them something so different. My biggest fear of having at the Toon would be the temptation to lump long balls up to him! However, if Crouch or another was not coming or Babel then Johns on a free would be a decent option. Better option than Fowler, Cole and the likes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 We wont get Crouch and Babel imo! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 I'd rather have Fowler/Cole, than spend £12m on Crouch and Babel when we simply don't need them. You're forgetting that Dyer's position should officially be striker now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now