Jump to content

Another Keegan article


LoveItIfWeBeatU

Recommended Posts

But, as we know, the financial gulf is between the big (financial) five and the rest, not any mythical financial big 4. 

 

There is currently a fairly clear top four (in recent seasons) in the premiership  -  on performance.  That is not what I (and the Keegan article) are talking about here though.

 

In terms of turnover:

 

Man Utd £166.4m

Chelsea £149.1m

Liverpool £122.4m

Arsenal £115.7m

Newcastle £87.1m

Spurs £70.6m

 

I'd say that the top 4 are in a league of their own, even financially. And I might be stubborn, or just thick, but I still read what Keegan's saying as the financial gulf clearly seperates the top 4 from Spurs.

 

 

Turnover isn't a true test of financial performance .... t/o should be taken with a pinch of salt - net profit is what you should be looking at .... failing that Gross Profit

 

 

 

bullocks.

 

EBITDA is where its at

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest jazzfido

So is this thread now anti-semantic/racist? It's just I know spurs have a large jewish following

 

Yours Sincerely

danswan

 

;)

I guess you are aware that semantic and semitic are two completely different things?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest jazzfido

So is this thread now anti-semantic/racist? It's just I know spurs have a large jewish following

 

Yours Sincerely

danswan

 

;)

I guess you are aware that semantic and semitic are two completely different things?

 

Get Luke Chadwick off you avatar!

How nice of you, complimenting Luke Chadwick.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest graemeh72

But, as we know, the financial gulf is between the big (financial) five and the rest, not any mythical financial big 4. 

 

There is currently a fairly clear top four (in recent seasons) in the premiership  -  on performance.  That is not what I (and the Keegan article) are talking about here though.

 

In terms of turnover:

 

Man Utd £166.4m

Chelsea £149.1m

Liverpool £122.4m

Arsenal £115.7m

Newcastle £87.1m

Spurs £70.6m

 

I'd say that the top 4 are in a league of their own, even financially. And I might be stubborn, or just thick, but I still read what Keegan's saying as the financial gulf clearly seperates the top 4 from Spurs.

 

 

Turnover isn't a true test of financial performance .... t/o should be taken with a pinch of salt - net profit is what you should be looking at .... failing that Gross Profit

 

 

 

bullocks.

 

EBITDA is where its at

 

lol  ;D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...