Colos Short and Curlies Posted May 29, 2007 Share Posted May 29, 2007 But, as we know, the financial gulf is between the big (financial) five and the rest, not any mythical financial big 4. There is currently a fairly clear top four (in recent seasons) in the premiership - on performance. That is not what I (and the Keegan article) are talking about here though. In terms of turnover: Man Utd £166.4m Chelsea £149.1m Liverpool £122.4m Arsenal £115.7m Newcastle £87.1m Spurs £70.6m I'd say that the top 4 are in a league of their own, even financially. And I might be stubborn, or just thick, but I still read what Keegan's saying as the financial gulf clearly seperates the top 4 from Spurs. Turnover isn't a true test of financial performance .... t/o should be taken with a pinch of salt - net profit is what you should be looking at .... failing that Gross Profit bullocks. EBITDA is where its at Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jazzfido Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 So is this thread now anti-semantic/racist? It's just I know spurs have a large jewish following Yours Sincerely danswan I guess you are aware that semantic and semitic are two completely different things? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 So is this thread now anti-semantic/racist? It's just I know spurs have a large jewish following Yours Sincerely danswan I guess you are aware that semantic and semitic are two completely different things? Get Luke Chadwick off you avatar! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jazzfido Posted May 31, 2007 Share Posted May 31, 2007 So is this thread now anti-semantic/racist? It's just I know spurs have a large jewish following Yours Sincerely danswan I guess you are aware that semantic and semitic are two completely different things? Get Luke Chadwick off you avatar! How nice of you, complimenting Luke Chadwick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
manorpark Posted May 31, 2007 Share Posted May 31, 2007 So is this thread now anti-semantic/racist? It's just I know spurs have a large jewish following Yours Sincerely danswan I assumed he was just joking . . . . . ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest graemeh72 Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 But, as we know, the financial gulf is between the big (financial) five and the rest, not any mythical financial big 4. There is currently a fairly clear top four (in recent seasons) in the premiership - on performance. That is not what I (and the Keegan article) are talking about here though. In terms of turnover: Man Utd £166.4m Chelsea £149.1m Liverpool £122.4m Arsenal £115.7m Newcastle £87.1m Spurs £70.6m I'd say that the top 4 are in a league of their own, even financially. And I might be stubborn, or just thick, but I still read what Keegan's saying as the financial gulf clearly seperates the top 4 from Spurs. Turnover isn't a true test of financial performance .... t/o should be taken with a pinch of salt - net profit is what you should be looking at .... failing that Gross Profit bullocks. EBITDA is where its at lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now