Dinho lad

http://cdn.playbuzz.com/cdn/bd0616cb-af58-4141-9ec7-7d9d78dde5ec/02d421be-2cd4-4290-b9b9-b496e34f3c96.gif

I won't be wasting my time on group of people that are so hell bent on pleasing each other to the point they can't critically assess each other's posts in order to avoid the awkward situation of hurting their friend's feelings. Awww, bless you all.

That's really ironic coming from you. You cover your arse more than anyone on here - hence why you're really argumentative. (FYI, if you say I'm argumentative, then you need your head checked, as I'm simply responding to a barrage of posts directed at me from the clique. You simply go around the forum and pick arguments with 'easy targets'.) Cover my arse. I don't think I've ever claimed to not be argumentative like, but I have no problem with admitting I was wrong, especially if the alternative is looking like a stubborn retard. Case in point. Being argumentative and the inability to admit you're wrong, comes hand in hand.

That's really ironic coming from you. You cover your arse more than anyone on here - hence why you're really argumentative. (FYI, if you say I'm argumentative, then you need your head checked, as I'm simply responding to a barrage of posts directed at me from the clique. You simply go around the forum and pick arguments with 'easy targets'.)

I don't invite the clique to gang up on me or on other people, I was simply having my say.

Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. There's saying you're going to let the process run its course and not condemn the player before a conviction, and then there's saying "We don't care if he might have raped someone, it was 10 years ago anyway and he's great." That's how you see it! Which clearly is bollocks. If anything, that statement is implicitly saying that it was not during his time at Juventus, and therefore allowing themselves the opportunity to distance themselves from whatever outcome of a trial. Amatures think a like, deary me (Maybe you're spending too much time together). Eh? They're explicit that it's not that they're saying they don't believe the allegations, they're saying that events of ten years ago won't change their opinion of him. Another one! No, you're wrong! They used the word 'allegedly', so why on earth should they, at this moment of time, change their opinion of him? They're saying the alleged events don't change their opinion of him. Not sure what's hard to understand like, tweets aren't that long. It's rightly been absolutely panned from all quarters, not sure why you're getting so upset and offended on their behalf. Snowflake culture. Riiiiiiiiiight...!

Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. There's saying you're going to let the process run its course and not condemn the player before a conviction, and then there's saying "We don't care if he might have raped someone, it was 10 years ago anyway and he's great." That's how you see it! Which clearly is bollocks. If anything, that statement is implicitly saying that it was not during his time at Juventus, and therefore allowing themselves the opportunity to distance themselves from whatever outcome of a trial. Amatures think a like, deary me (Maybe you're spending too much time together). Eh? They're explicit that it's not that they're saying they don't believe the allegations, they're saying that events of ten years ago won't change their opinion of him. Another one! No, you're wrong! They used the word 'allegedly', so why on earth should they, at this moment of time, change their opinion of him? They're saying the alleged events don't change their opinion of him. Not sure what's hard to understand like, tweets aren't that long. :lol: No, they're saying it because there is not reason to believe it at this moment.

I've come to that conclusion based on the fact that the people in charge of Juventus probably aren't mentally retarded enough to deny allegations that Ronaldo has already admitted. I could be wrong of course. You're going round in circles! 'Why do you believe in God? Because the Bible says so. Why do you believe the Bible? Because it's from God! ` I explained it in my next post, but sure, I'll go again. Ronaldo has admitted to rape in a document to his legal team. This gives us two options when looking at Juventus' reaction in light of your argument that they haven't seen any credible proof/information regarding the rape. Juventus may choose not to believe this, they may deem it as "not credible", but that makes them wrong, because it is credible proof, it's an admission of guilt from Ronaldo. Juventus may not have seen it, which means they do not want to see it. :lol: Go home, buddy, you're a dipstick! Out of arguments, embarassed and humiliated. Sad story Dinho Lad, but you'll bounce back. Seriously, do you still not see how stupid your argument is? Utterly stupid.

Yeah, clearly you're influencing each other too much.

Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. There's saying you're going to let the process run its course and not condemn the player before a conviction, and then there's saying "We don't care if he might have raped someone, it was 10 years ago anyway and he's great." That's how you see it! Which clearly is bollocks. If anything, that statement is implicitly saying that it was not during his time at Juventus, and therefore allowing themselves the opportunity to distance themselves from whatever outcome of a trial. Amatures think a like, deary me (Maybe you're spending too much time together). Eh? They're explicit that it's not that they're saying they don't believe the allegations, they're saying that events of ten years ago won't change their opinion of him. Another one! No, you're wrong! They used the word 'allegedly', so why on earth should they, at this moment of time, change their opinion of him?

I've come to that conclusion based on the fact that the people in charge of Juventus probably aren't mentally retarded enough to deny allegations that Ronaldo has already admitted. I could be wrong of course. You're going round in circles! 'Why do you believe in God? Because the Bible says so. Why do you believe the Bible? Because it's from God! ` I explained it in my next post, but sure, I'll go again. Ronaldo has admitted to rape in a document to his legal team. This gives us two options when looking at Juventus' reaction in light of your argument that they haven't seen any credible proof/information regarding the rape. Juventus may choose not to believe this, they may deem it as "not credible", but that makes them wrong, because it is credible proof, it's an admission of guilt from Ronaldo. Juventus may not have seen it, which means they do not want to see it. :lol: Go home, buddy, you're a dipstick!

I've come to that conclusion based on the fact that the people in charge of Juventus probably aren't mentally retarded enough to deny allegations that Ronaldo has already admitted. I could be wrong of course. You're going round in circles! 'Why do you believe in God? Because the Bible says so. Why do you believe the Bible? Because it's from God! `

Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. There's saying you're going to let the process run its course and not condemn the player before a conviction, and then there's saying "We don't care if he might have raped someone, it was 10 years ago anyway and he's great." That's how you see it! Which clearly is bollocks. If anything, that statement is implicitly saying that it was not during his time at Juventus, and therefore allowing themselves the opportunity to distance themselves from whatever outcome of a trial. Amatures think a like, deary me (Maybe you're spending too much time together).

How how to you come to the conclusion that Juventus have deemed this to be 'credible', then? Also, as I mentioned, just because some magazine have reported it doesn't mean that Juventus have to treat it as a legitimate source of information! Maybe if the paperwork was directly sent to them by the woman's lawyer, then I can understand. But at the moment there's nothing to suggest that Juventus have been approached by lawyers.

Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. They have seen information that is credible to them, Ronaldo has pretty much admitted rape to his lawyers. Yeah, where? What a magazine reports does not count, btw! (Because that's not how it works in the business and legal world, just before you ask why! )

Just waiting for the next damning audio recording being posted about us all being Liberal Fanboys, putting us all right in our place having FINALLY been told it like it is. The consequences will never be the same. Can wait to see the next picture you post claiming to be a lookalike of.

Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest.

Possibly the worst worded statement ever released from a football club, that. Reads like they're saying "aye he might've raped someone, but it was 10 years ago, so who cares? He's class at football y'kna?" I think KI's last post here is more applicable to you, actually. Maybe I shouldn't have been too harsh on KI.

You are unbelievably tedious.

I'm sure everyone is concerned with your thoughts on the matter.

You must be the liberals that have dragged down the left in recent years. Fucking hell.

Because if they didn't, they'd look as if they're not backing their player. (Which would be awkward between CR7 and them if he turns out to be innocent)