geordie_b

I think CAT coming first was preferential as info which would be private in arbitration would have already been made public in CAT, thus applying pressure on arbitration result

Think it was telling that the Justice stepped in when PL said no loss had occurred and stepped in to query SJHL regarding the amount they were claiming as a loss. You could infer that he has already decided that standing exists and that it’s more than likely the case goes ahead

I think he will claim that he said it in error, but was there to put some doubt in CATs mind Either way it really pissed Lewis off

BeoutQ

As much for us getting our club back, id love us to win just to see the look on the faces of Lewis/Masters/Hoffman etc utter cunts

Lewis needs a slap

Perfectly put

Justice, the football club doesnt have any function atm

Quietly fold his glasses and put them into his top pocket Rafa stylee

Sneaky PL snakes, I dont think Lewis is happy that Jowell is realising this info into the public domain

I think they really really dont want anything to be public, if there is a threat of dirty laundry being aired then I think the goalposts move signficantly (ie CAT goes ahead)

Judge definately seems bored by all this waffle. Does anyone know what his/CAT starting stance is? Do the PL have the convince him to throw it out or do we have to pursade him that their is a case to run?

We cant prove a loss as you wont let us sell the club

That was my initial thought, is it Palace or Burnley who are now owned by a company in Delaware?

Its at the end in the AOB section... Any other bellends

Love how he says the rules state the details have to be private, they are your rules dickhead, you can break them if you want

aaaaaaaaaaaanndddddd here come the delays

He'd have been playing against us for Watford yesterday if he had

Or just keep them in the cesspit that is twitter

Not booked for taking his shirt off?

So Watford have made 4 subs (not really been watching) so one of them was a concussion replacement? Is the person who makes that judgement independent and is the player restricted from player for X games/days after? Not seen a concussion replacement before so unsure on the protocol

Stupidity from Ritchie

I see the mighty Rafa got beat by 3 goals at Villa, he'll be chalking that up as a win tonight

If you added all those 32 shots togther I doubt it would cover the length of the pitch, crisp packet boots

Yet still kicks it better for us than Luuk de Jong and he started for Barca in the Chmpions League this week