Jump to content

Unbelievable

Member
  • Posts

    45,241
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Unbelievable

  1. 'Only way to watch PL football in SA is through illegal streams' Well i can see why this happened then. This is all on the PL, they created this mess. Open to correction but Bein bought the rights to show it in Saudi and then the Saudis refused and pirated it instead no? No indeed
  2. I love how that BEIN bloke explains how them paying huge money for TV rights is money that trickles down directly to the communities in which the PL clubs reside. He obviously isn't very aware of what's been happening here at NUFC if that'sof any concern to him
  3. Yep, but the wording in the tweet is directly copied from the Times article. Shoddy writing from a supposedly quality newspaper.
  4. Ridiculous comparison. We know The Stavely bid has serious money behind it, to the tune of eclipsing the fortune of other PL club owners. Nobody knows even the first thing about the wealth of this American guy.
  5. Pahahaha, what a fucking imbecile! It’s never a pretty sight when people self-flagellate in the company of others even if everybody knows they are of course absolutely correct and justified in doing so . You shouldn’t be too hard on yourself mate, especially on a public forum.
  6. BeoutQ has been closed down, last August, what more can they do? Allow Qatar to prosecute the individuals concerned? That's basically what the entire WTO thing is about, Saudi Arabia's refusal to allow this to happen. There’s servers in the UK offering illegal streams, how many prosecutions do you hear of. It’s not easy to catch the perpetrators as you think and I guess it’s the same in any country. That's irrelevant. They've literally been denied the right to prosecute on the grounds of diplomacy, what, 9 times they've tried? So as to "what more could they do?" the answer is clear - Allow those prosecutions to take place. That's not saying they must convict, but they should at least have the right to be tested in a court. Have they arrested anyone? You presume that they know who the perpetrators are so enlighten me. There is an IP-focused report by the US Trade association from 2019 that confirms that arrests have been made and offices raided in Riyadh, concerning beoutQ. By who the Saudi Government? Yeah, I'll try to find it. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2020_Special_301_Report.pdf Page 31: "BeoutQ, the notorious online and satellite piracy service reportedly operating out of Saudi Arabia, was taken offline in August 2019, and the Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property has since raided stores selling illicit streaming devices and conducted IP awareness campaigns to combat online piracy." The section on Saudi Arabia is on page 54. The report is actually from April 2020. It doesn't actually mention arrests but some sort of crackdown has apparently happened and the US are pretty much the only country that's allowed some forms of independent monitoring in KSA, so if anybody knows it's them. Raiding stores selling set top boxes is a far cry from arresting the people behind it mind. I’m still far from convinced that even if BEIN had the option to use the KSA legal system they would have actually been able to go after anyone. I presume they would have to present a reasonable case to even get the KSA prosecutors to consider it.
  7. WTO have that right. PL just have their test, part of which is not having been involved with piracy, which imo this report is miles from proving as far as PIF is concerned. The problem is, from what I gather, the Premier league don't need watertight "proof" to reject it; if they think that the Saudis are responsible (either proactively or by turning a blind eye) or that they're not doing enough, they can reject the takeover on the grounds of reasonable belief. I've read plenty to contradict the above as well mind, and the money that's already been put down may well cause a legal shitstorm, so who knows. (Nobody, it seems) It's clearly up in the air, but at the stage we're now at I don't really understand those who are jumping on people with a more negative perspective, at the moment the takeover is clearly in the balance and could go either way. It's certainly not a cast iron certainty that it will go through and this place will be a mess if it doesn't. That’s my understanding too. The O&D test gives the PL plenty of wiggle room to decide however they wish (legal challenge possible, but not very likely imo to revert their decision), so it basically comes down to: what do the PL want? Which let’s be honest is the one thing they exist to accomplish, which is to maximise their and the PL clubs’ revenue streams. The PL will use this as leverage to pit the Qataris and Saudis against each other commercially to strike the best possible TV deal they can when the current one expires. I believe BEIN’s reaction to the WTO report acknowledges and pre-empts that in a desperate last ditch attempt to create doubt in the PL’s mind that approving the takeover may see them walk from the negotiation table for the next round of talks. Will the PL buckle to their pressure or call their bluff? If they believe in their product they will do the latter imo.
  8. WTO have that right. PL just have their test, part of which is not having been involved with piracy, which imo this report is miles from proving as far as PIF is concerned.
  9. The Saudi state broke international law, as ruled by the governing body of that piece of international law. Not that this was ever in serious dispute. Given the violation centred on the IP rights of a Premier League broadcaster, it would obviously be wildly inappropriate to allow that state to then purchase a Premier League football club. That's why the takeover will be rejected. Have you read the conclusion yourself? The first bit you bolded is negated by section 8.1.c.i. The second bit about Saudi Arabia not having "provided criminal procedures and penalties to be applied to beoutQ despite the evidence establishing prima facie that beoutQ is operated by individuals or entities under the jurisdiction of Saudi Arabia" is not, but the investigation panel's final recommendation is "that Saudi Arabia bring its measures into conformity with its obligations under the TRIPS Agreement." That's a small slap on the wrist at the very most. I can't see the PL using such a weak conclusion as grounds for a rejection. The KSA, let alone PIF, or anyone directly involved with the NUFC bid is not even close to being accused of being involved with or facilitating piracy. All the report concludes is that intellectual property holders should get access to the SA justice system to file a complaint and have their case considered.
  10. If that is true it's safe to say that the "PIF is a separate legal entity from the KSA so legally there is nothing the PL can do within their D&O test as it is to stop this deal going through" was entirely misconceived. The PL and its rights holders are holding KSA to account through PIF's involvement in the NUFC takeover. I have a feeling it will all unravel from here, in typical Newcastle United style.
  11. Yes that is true, but it doesn't happen immediately. It takes a few years of success for any particular team to generate money for the PL. Leicesters year was the most entertaining in bloody ages, but almost certain the PL income was down that year, as they didn't have the reach of the traditional 'big' teams I'd love to see some sort of study on tv viewing figures for all games, social media engagement etc etc comparing the figures between seasons where theres a tight title race with Leicester (or hell Chelsea or City) winning and Man Utd or Liverpool running away with it (obviously can't really use this season due to the disruption). My guess is there would be higher viewing figures and general engagement when Man Utd or Liverpool are winning it compared to Leicesters title win. Seriously doubt that like. I know a lot of casual fans of English football were tuning in when Leicester were on their magic run to the title and there was tremendous hype from the media that wouldn't have been there had one of the usual suspects run away with it. I think after a few years of domination by any one team things become stale and a lot of casual fans lose interest. Obviously die hard fans will always tune in, but that is not their growth market I don't think. They need big stories and big games, and the more teams capable of challenging at the top the better. Same goes for a big team underperforming massively; another reason why casual fans might be more inclined to tune in.
  12. On a legal level waving through the takeover has nothing to do with Qatar/Bein does it? They own the broadcasting rights for a specified period of time for a specified region. Surely they don't have a say in which teams are in the league and who their owners are? On an informal level I understand they can exert huge (commercial) pressure on the PL, but I don't see how they could legally challenge beyond that option being open to any other outsider to the specific deal in question.
  13. That whole thread is probably the most enlightening I've read on the whole piracy subject, well worth a read. Feeling a bit more positive after reading that too. The bit where he argues both failing to control piracy and directly starting/running the channel are "crimes deserving of hefty punishment" has me confused to be honest although admittedly I'm not very well versed in copyright law. How can a sovereign nation commit a crime by "failing to control piracy"? I mean, I understand that the PL and the right holders might have their views on what SA should have been doing with respect to stopping Beoutq stealing their content, but a crime..? Isn't it a soverign state's perogative to either pursue or not pursue piracy just like it is their perogative to do many other things people may find objectionable?
  14. Oh my God, GLEX is coming my way. Should I start packing my suitcase?
  15. It landed for a minute or two then went back up and started circling. Fuck knaas what's happening. Ashley’s been reading this thread and figured it would be a good laugh to dispatch his helicopter to Farnborough, have it land briefly and then circle the air above it to send yous in a frenzy
  16. POOT is back Welcome back mate. Echo your hopes that good things are on the way
  17. We were poor this first half indeed, but Sunderland haven’t been much better iyam
  18. Ditto. We were battered first half iirc. Doesn’t look so bad first 15 or so minutes. I was in the away end with a couple of colleagues from Longbenton. Great day out, especially the second half and the bar afterwards for obvious reasons
×
×
  • Create New...