Unbelievable

That XI

Comparing our lowest attendance with their highest. Well, that's one way of managing to come out on top Can we compare our 68,386 attendance against Chelsea in 1930 against their 8,003 attendance vs Plymouth in 1989? Or their 6,904 against Barnsley in the FM Cup in 86? They're just completely barking mad..

Their special way of turning the Stadium of Shite into a fortress..

In answer to the question who out of them and us has the highest league attendance record:

I'm afraid you need to deposit £5 into a skybet account before you can join I'm afraid I can't even open a Skybet account from NL. Oh well..

More Korean cartoons..

Catts for me like: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=707387

Sorry if Giggs, but do you need a Skybet account to join or can you pay by other means (creditcard?) as well?

So this is a "transfer rumour in the press" supported by a wikipedia article which you haven't even bothered to edit to make it mention us? Anyway, will be interesting to see how he does at the Euros. Looks like he's now our first choice left back..

Is that you Sir Sbragia?

I love hove MON appears to be shitting bricks when he arrives at Sunderland..

http://www.peacecup.com//admin/amboard/imgview.php?no=1920&fno=29013&group=basic&code=webtoon_ko

Does it say anything about us? No, but interestingly he does mention that there are several agents involved who would all require their cut of a transfer fee, which ties in with something that has been mentioned by the English press about us losing interest in signing him. Seems like both clubs are using the media to warn his advisors about not playing hardball for their piece of the pie.

How so? Just questioning your sources. NUFC blog's twitter for fuck's sake, and now some dodgy column in the Daily Fail?

FC Twente chairman has come out and said selling Douglas must be financially attractive and enable them to get a replacement in or they will keep hold of him until his registration expires at the end of next season. http://www.vi.nl/nieuws/222169/FC-Twente-vindt-verkoop-Douglas-nog-niet-aantrekkelijk.htm

Daily Fail? Especially this part:

He used to play for my hometown club and was adored by the fans, so that would be a no..

Final Holland vs Spain, Holland to win Top scorer Van Persie Player to watch Narsingh How far will England go? 3rd in group behind France and Sweden Most looking forward to France vs England, Germany vs Holland Least looking forward to Racism and hooliganism Best Hodgson moment Managing to hold onto his job after a disastrous campaign

Mine is using the assuption that Spain & Germany both top their groups or did you not think of that? Well yes, after the first round not everything is possible anymore, but why would you assume where teams finish in their group and then say "assuming its possible obviously, havent checked"? Erm because i think as the two tourny favourites i think they will finish top of their respected groups? Not difficult tbh. Also the second part is clearly in reference to the fact i havent checked who plays who after the groups other than England will likely get Spain(just been on radio). Never thought i would have to explain such matters of the blindingly obvious like..... Well, to me "possible" means theoretically possible, not likely based on certain assumptions. Also, to just assume Germany will win their group with Portugal and the Netherlands, two other favourites for the title, in it, and also Denmark who come into the tournament as one of the in form nations is quite a leap of logic. Christ are you on a wind up today? The question was 'Final prediction' and you are whinging over leap of logic regarding group positions? I think both will win their groups and unless they meet in the semis i think they will contest the final. Why is this so baffling to you? f***ing hell your name is wonderfully apt to reading such guff. If you don't understand how saying you've not checked a final is possible without referring to the apparently relevant assumption that your finalists both need to win their groups too I'm not sure if you're one to talk about logic. What a tool, i explained it twice now to you, as if it was ever important to start with Oh, I understood what you were saying the first time. Doesn't make it right. No need for the insults too.

Mine is using the assuption that Spain & Germany both top their groups or did you not think of that? Well yes, after the first round not everything is possible anymore, but why would you assume where teams finish in their group and then say "assuming its possible obviously, havent checked"? Erm because i think as the two tourny favourites i think they will finish top of their respected groups? Not difficult tbh. Also the second part is clearly in reference to the fact i havent checked who plays who after the groups other than England will likely get Spain(just been on radio). Never thought i would have to explain such matters of the blindingly obvious like..... Well, to me "possible" means theoretically possible, not likely based on certain assumptions. Also, to just assume Germany will win their group with Portugal and the Netherlands, two other favourites for the title, in it, and also Denmark who come into the tournament as one of the in form nations is quite a leap of logic. Christ are you on a wind up today? The question was 'Final prediction' and you are whinging over leap of logic regarding group positions? I think both will win their groups and unless they meet in the semis i think they will contest the final. Why is this so baffling to you? f***ing hell your name is wonderfully apt to reading such guff. If you don't understand how saying you've not checked a final is possible without referring to the apparently relevant assumption that your finalists both need to win their groups too I'm not sure if you're one to talk about logic.

Mine is using the assuption that Spain & Germany both top their groups or did you not think of that? Well yes, after the first round not everything is possible anymore, but why would you assume where teams finish in their group and then say "assuming its possible obviously, havent checked"? Erm because i think as the two tourny favourites i think they will finish top of their respected groups? Not difficult tbh. Also the second part is clearly in reference to the fact i havent checked who plays who after the groups other than England will likely get Spain(just been on radio). Never thought i would have to explain such matters of the blindingly obvious like..... Well, to me "possible" means theoretically possible, not likely based on certain assumptions. Also, to just assume Germany will win their group with Portugal and the Netherlands, two other favourites for the title, in it, and also Denmark who come into the tournament as one of the in form nations is quite a leap of logic.

Mine is using the assuption that Spain & Germany both top their groups or did you not think of that? Well yes, after the first round not everything is possible anymore, but why would you assume where teams finish in their group and then say "assuming its possible obviously, havent checked"?

This is why. http://i45.servimg.com/u/f45/16/55/20/10/ko_pha10.png So? Any team can finish first and second in their group, can't they? In theory every team can meet every other team in the final, even if they are in the same group.

Again, why do people assume not every final is a possibility before the tournament has even kicked off?