Ronaldo

the fuck???

very true, you're talking a lot of sense for a change Keefaz :winking:

to be honest yeah, more likely than not this one

have always rated Viduka, but now that he's coming I just feel sick

The guy doesn't deserve defending to be honest, but............. what i will say is that he's the type of footballer that needs to be used in a very certain way and if we had played to his strengths (for a sustained period) I would agree entirely that he's a waste of space.

Striker's goals tbh . strikers rarely get chances as easy as those, thats all i was saying So you intend to ignore all goals scored that are "easy"? absolutely not, Van Nistelrooy is one of my favourite players in the world to watch. all i'm saying is, his 4 goals cannot be taken seriously as an indication of his strike rate for the season. 2 goals were mishits, the other 2 were as a result of comincal defending. ie, predicated on unusual circumstances that he'll probably have to wait moths for I hope you treat Shola's (an inferior player to Zamora) goals in a similar manner, then. In the interests of fairness. ha! don't get me started on Shola mate Preaching to the converted? hallelujah

Striker's goals tbh . strikers rarely get chances as easy as those, thats all i was saying So you intend to ignore all goals scored that are "easy"? absolutely not, Van Nistelrooy is one of my favourite players in the world to watch. all i'm saying is, his 4 goals cannot be taken seriously as an indication of his strike rate for the season. 2 goals were mishits, the other 2 were as a result of comincal defending. ie, predicated on unusual circumstances that he'll probably have to wait moths for I hope you treat Shola's (an inferior player to Zamora) goals in a similar manner, then. In the interests of fairness. ha! don't get me started on Shola mate

Striker's goals tbh . strikers rarely get chances as easy as those, thats all i was saying So you intend to ignore all goals scored that are "easy"? absolutely not, Van Nistelrooy is one of my favourite players in the world to watch. all i'm saying is, his 4 goals cannot be taken seriously as an indication of his strike rate for the season. 2 goals were mishits, the other 2 were as a result of comincal defending. ie, predicated on unusual circumstances that he'll probably have to wait moths for

Striker's goals tbh . strikers rarely get chances as easy as those, thats all i was saying

goal v Charton - tap in goal v Chalton - luckiest goal ever, mishit goal v Watford - awful defending, tap in goal v Liverpool - mishit cross, awful goalkeeping he's a decent enough player, but 4 goals in 3 games is an awfully inaccurate representation

is Peter Reid back on the bottle? he doesn't seem to have a clue what's going on

pure quality, was virtually on his arse, even the corwd hadn't spotted Solano at the back post, absolute brilliance

he finishing is magnificent, if we scrap the fucking long ball he would look every inch the perfect cente forward amazing 20 mins from Albert today

How can anyone back Luque for a bad season and Shola for a good one? It defies all logic ! The main difference between the players is that Shola really wants to play for the club, and Luque doesn't. I didn't see Luque on MTV making us all look like twats by talking about his furnishings and shoe collection

the stars of our team this year are gonna be Taylor, Milner, Finnigan, Carroll or Troisi?? fucking hell

wish Mark Lawrenson could see that the next time he goes on about our 'awful defence' but yes it is worrying, we all know we need at least 1 20 goal striker

Man utd a better team than Liverpool?

you deserve it with your ignorance of our team, needing a CB before a LB and RB??? you silly boy That's my personal opinion. Put it this way, i would rather carr or babayaro starting for my team then titus bramble. your opinion is shared by many, which is actually quite sad considering the amount of ability Bramble has in relation to a waste of space like Carr or Baba

you deserve it with your ignorance of our team, needing a CB before a LB and RB??? you silly boy

1.Chelsea 2.Liverpool 3.Arsenal 4.Man utd 5.Spurs 6.Newcastle (7th-8th unless we sign a stiker, 5th if we get a striker and Bridge) Aston Villa (without signings) Sheffield Utd Watford Henry and Sheva will both finish on 25

can't belive so many have predicted other than Chelsea for 1st place they have 25 players that would get into any Xl in the world

Do we really need a right-winger that badly? could be a great investment though

Got to be honest, he seems like a bigger annorack than Roeder good manager thought in fairness, pissed off he said no to us but considered Boro

agree with that, but in fairness, Kuyt's power in the box could surely be used to better effect in the premiership

i seen him play most of last season, and in the world cup, but still dont think he is worth the gamble, as he is unproven at the highest level, and although he may have scored alot of goals for feyenoord, Kezman scored over 40 goals in a season in Holland, for PSV, and look whats happened to him. For me, like i have said, he is just not worth the risk of spending another £10m+ on someone who may not cut it in the premiership. But its all about opinions and everybody has one Kezman failed because he didnt have the physical presence for the premiership and Chelsea's style of play, kuyt is more ideal for the prem than the eredivise imo its all about opinions, and i respect yours, but mine is that he is not worth the gamble because there is a chance that he may not cut it in the premiership, and we should go for a proven premiership striker, is all i'm saying but where's the risk in that? i'm thinking back to the summer of 2001