Jump to content

ChrisMcQuillan

Member
  • Posts

    3,988
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ChrisMcQuillan

  1. If true, given her people probably look on Twitter, forums, etc, is it really wise for someone to 'reveal' something like this? :lol:

     

    It’s probably not wise for her to start calling random nutters off the internet who’ve tracked down her private address and discuss details of a 300m takeover of a football club.

     

    I'd imagine random nutters are canny far down on her list of "people I need to call when bidding hundreds of millions on something as public as a football team"

     

    :lol:

     

    I do want it to be true (on some levels, just to confirm it's happening) but the responses on here are fantastic. :lol:

  2. Apart from Anfield (which I didn't see), the only time he's conceded has been at Bournemouth (and only after he was nearly knocked out by Shelvey, and I'm convinced wasn't moving freely).

     

     

  3.  

     

    Family reasons. f*** off with that s*** man.

     

    Some guys go for the comfortable option. You have to question his attitude and commitment.

     

    It's been clear for a while Klopp hasn't been happy with him. He's been playing Dominic Solanke ahead of the guy for goodness sake! And before him Origi was ahead of Sturridge.

     

    Something isn't right there at all. Think he just wants to play when he feels like, and do what he wants when he's out on the pitch.

     

    He is up for a rude awakening under Pardew. Lonely afternoons at the top end of the pitch, with your team mates far off in the distance all defending.

     

    Why question the attitude of players when it's player after player after player that chooses to go elsewhere at the very moment that the reins are handed over to Charnley. Don't be so ridiculous.

     

    This, in a nutshell.

     

    Obviously there are reasons why any one or two players would choose to go elsewhere. It happens with us nearly any time interest is expressed from anywhere else.

     

    We must have a really toxic reputation as an employer in the football world.

  4. We're down without fresh blood, IMO.

     

    And if we do go down with this squad, and no saleable assets, that's us in the Championship for a while. The end of Rafa, and the end of the takeover bids.

     

    As someone's pointed out, what Ashley's doing is insanity, and it now appears more than ever to be little more than a cold-blooded desire to be, as Llambias put it, "fucking horrible."

  5. Just based on what I've watched this season:

     

                        de Gea

     

          Otamendi - Pique - Stones

     

                    Matic - Pogba

     

      Messi -----  De Bruyne  ---- Neymar

     

                    Kane - Cavani

  6. Really like to see UEFA and the PL take the squad registration one step further and limit clubs to a certain number of professionals, whether they be out on loan or not. Say for example you can only own 30 players over the age of 21. Chelsea must have around double that number.

     

    They had 40 odd on loan, so assuming they have a 25 man squad plus a few still around, they're probably knocking on about 80 players.

     

    EDIT: According to Eurosport, "Manchester City have 82 players on their books with Chelsea overseeing 75 and Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur on 74."

×
×
  • Create New...