christ

16 minutes ago, Miggys First Goal said:

Mint. We’re going to be on GB News. 
 

 

I’ve seen their viewing figures. I refuse to believe hundreds of people have been asking for this.

It’s definitely Raylor he’s referring to. Stevie T was more likely to lick a TV screen than smash it.

1 hour ago, SweMag said:

Again, Ben Jacobs is full of shit. Stop reading his tweets. He was all over the BZG takeover in 2019 and said a verbal agreement of £350m was in place and also proof of funds, deal could be completed very soon. He also said the BZG wanted Benitez to stay as manager but that they also had their eyes on Wenger and Mourinho...

How anyone can look at his track record - not just in our takeover(s) - and think he’s anything other than a total gobshite I do not know. Dodgy as fuck.

45 minutes ago, Lazarus said:

Everyone does realise that if it goes through were not gonna be spunking 150m here, 180m there ala man city?

Didnt Staveley say they werent gonna be spunking cash all owa?

I’d take a bleb of pre-cum.

24 minutes ago, nufcnick said:

 

You can be friends/associates with someone, it doesn’t mean you have the same views as that person 

Give your head a wobble you silly bugger.

The problem with Stone Cold Steve Daftcunt isn’t that he has the same views of Tommy Robinson. He probably doesn’t. It’s that he’s such a shameless self publicist he think it’s fine to platform the dickhead.

Is this the old legal strategy of making as much of a nuisance of yourself as possible in the hope the other side get sick/run out of money?

11 hours ago, ToonArmy1892 said:

We really don't need two threads on the takeover imo, positive and negative discussion can happen in the same thread.

It's a bit childish.

It’s mental is what it is.

I’m generally quite positive about the takeover happening eventually, but I think Keith is a massive self publicising bullshitter. In which thread do I belong? Or do I have to split my time equally between the two threads?

If you can’t handle reading opinions that might not exactly align with your own the internet might not be for you.

17 minutes ago, Ronson333 said:

Definitely some mackems on this thread, who keep voting up each other’s negative posts. 

Let’s not go full RTG.

It’s a Super Soaker full of Fukushima water. At first you think you’re just wet, but give it a decade or two and boom - thyroid cancer.

I could make my peace with gay murdering despots but I draw the line at Tories.

3 minutes ago, Rocker said:

Gazette will be getting a juicy NUFC story tomorrow morning (late this evening). Apparently. 

Robinsons announced as our new global fruit cordial partner.

17 minutes ago, RS said:

You allegedly fed 5000 people with 7 loaves and you’re  dissing the bread worship on here??

I’m just bitter because I’m gluten intolerant.

3 minutes ago, Rocker said:

I don't think anyone is looking too much in to it. It's quite obviously tongue-in-cheek.

 

 

Not necessarily on here, but there are definitely chunks of NUFC Twitter that are going to be very disappointed when it turns out NDM is actually just really into sourdough.

“Nick DeMarco is sending me coded takeover messages via the medium of bread” is De Clerambault as fuck lads. It does not reflect well on our fan base that this is widely accepted as fact.

1 minute ago, gazza ladra said:

I suspect that Man City and Chelsea aside, they are all in serious financial trouble.  It's a gambit for survival.

Definitely. Perez gave the game away yesterday. They’re scrambling around and if the governing bodies hold their nerves and sanction them as threatened they’ll lose their nerve.

14 minutes ago, jdckelly said:

if anybody is shaky on this its Chelsea/Man City they don't need the money and I'm baffled as to why they signed up in the first place they're in it for PR purposes 

A fear of being left behind?

It just takes one or two of the clubs to pull out and the entire thing will fall over IMO.

6 minutes ago, Miggys First Goal said:

I swear to God, if they capitulate to these rat bastards...

I’m not sure how they can. The governing bodies are in damned if they do, damned if they don’t territory but giving any sort of meaningful ground on the SL is signing their own death warrants. 

Parody account lads.

8 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

On what route?

Yellow Metro line. Just hovering over Simonside as we speak.

I’d like to be optimistic about this, but I just see it as Ashley grabbing the opportunity to lay off staff and use the ownership question as a convenient excuse. 

31 minutes ago, joeyt said:

Worth a new contract?

Not if we’re going to keep trying to turn him to a wing back. 
 

I think he’s good going forward - decent turn of pace and probably one of the better crossers of the ball at the club. I’d keep him around providing the dickhead in the dugout doesn’t expect him to spend most of the match defending.

14 minutes ago, Joey Linton said:

That totally misrepresents the situation - I've no intention of pledging if i then have to be a Trust member to have a say about my pledge. 

What type of say do you expect exactly? You’re pledging money that will go towards the purchase of a stake in the club.

You don’t donate to Barnardo’s and get to pick and choose which kids they help 

Just now, InspectorCoarse said:

Lol Shearer will stick exactly £ 1 in : )

That much?

1 minute ago, JJ7 said:

However you're allowed an opinion on whether you think fan group ownership, or a fans group having a seat on the board is a good idea or not. It's not just a test of who is optimistic and who is miserable.

Of course, but that doesn’t seem to be what people are griping about.