biggs Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Anal oliver the hypocritical two faced wanker trying to butt fuck fat sam i guess Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 I cant remember reading about this deal in any of Augusts Chronie's, did Olly not report on this transfer saga at the time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 He saw Elano as a forward then. In which case we have the personnel. I reckon its more likely the Journal saw him playing in a more forward role against us and decided he is a forward when making up their story. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Synthespian Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 He saw Elano as a forward then. In which case we have the personnel. I reckon its more likely the Journal saw him playing in a more forward role against us and decided he is a forward when making up their story. ha-ha-ha-ha. SOLD! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1878 Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Funny how this comes out after Elano grabs all the headlines in a game against Newcastle Total bollocks I reckon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Funny how this comes out after Elano grabs all the headlines in a game against Newcastle Total bollocks I reckon Exactly. If he played shite there would have been no mention of this whatsoever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SLK Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 He saw Elano as a forward then. In which case we have the personnel. He saw Elano as a forward not a midfielder BUT saw Smith as a midfielder not a forward Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sicsfingeredmong Posted October 4, 2007 Share Posted October 4, 2007 in the Journal it said words to the effect that sam dediced not to go for Elano as he already had a "wealth of riches upfront". THAT I find extremely worrying Even more worrying is the new board, if there is a grain of truth to this story, let one slip through the cracks thanks to their over-conservative approach for much of the transfer window. Wouldn't suprise me in the slightest though as i think, and my recollection might be wide of the mark here, we only completed the Barton deal after the incoming funds from the outgoing transfer involving Parker were confirmed. A pattern did emerge over the course of the window. Hopefully they've, and i refer to Mort, learnt a valuable lesson abeit a costly one re:transfer window strategy................... "buy before you sell". Transfer A relying on the outcome Transfer B only serves the purpose of allowing another club to steal somebody's thunder/getting a successful & late crack at a player ie. Elano. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigSamsBarmyArmy Posted October 5, 2007 Share Posted October 5, 2007 in the Journal it said words to the effect that sam dediced not to go for Elano as he already had a "wealth of riches upfront". THAT I find extremely worrying There's at least £20M of talent up front. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazy Posted October 5, 2007 Share Posted October 5, 2007 No idea how having Owen, Martins, Viduka and Alan smith as attacking options is 'worrying'. The only thing I find worrying is that we're still playing Shola Ameobi up there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now