TRon Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Would people rather have signed no one, than have signed Richardson then? I'd rather have signed someone else than waste precious time trying to make daft deals which never had chance in hell of coming off. But to answer the question.........? Let me rephrase it then: I'd rather have attempted to sign someone else than waste precious time trying to make daft deals which never had chance in hell of coming off. But to answer the question..... ...or to stop avoiding the answer? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Would people rather have signed no one, than have signed Richardson then? I'd rather have signed someone else than waste precious time trying to make daft deals which never had chance in hell of coming off. But to answer the question.........? Let me rephrase it then: I'd rather have attempted to sign someone else than waste precious time trying to make daft deals which never had chance in hell of coming off. But to answer the question..... ...or to stop avoiding the answer? You've not answered it. If it was sign Richardson or get no one, which would you prefer? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Would people rather have signed no one, than have signed Richardson then? I'd rather have signed someone else than waste precious time trying to make daft deals which never had chance in hell of coming off. But to answer the question.........? Let me rephrase it then: I'd rather have attempted to sign someone else than waste precious time trying to make daft deals which never had chance in hell of coming off. But to answer the question..... ...or to stop avoiding the answer? You've not answered it. If it was sign Richardson or get no one, which would you prefer? Did we sign Richardson? Was it a fruitful use of time pursuing him on the last day of the window? These are more important questions that need answering I feel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Would people rather have signed no one, than have signed Richardson then? I'd rather have signed someone else than waste precious time trying to make daft deals which never had chance in hell of coming off. But to answer the question.........? Let me rephrase it then: I'd rather have attempted to sign someone else than waste precious time trying to make daft deals which never had chance in hell of coming off. But to answer the question..... ...or to stop avoiding the answer? You've not answered it. If it was sign Richardson or get no one, which would you prefer? Did we sign Richardson? Was it a fruitful use of time pursuing him on the last day of the window? These are more important questions that need answering I feel. Maybe, but what's your answer to the one I've asked? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Do people actually think there is any weight to this story? I'd put money down on it just being Sbragia(sp?) talking shit to try and get Kinnear in more hot water. Don't believe this for a second. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Do people actually think there is any weight to this story? I'd put money down on it just being Sbragia(sp?) talking shit to try and get Kinnear in more hot water. Don't believe this for a second. The club were quick to deny the Martins/Bent swap so if it's not true I'm pretty sure they would have said something by now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now