Fugazi Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 why did Lizzy read half an email, then pull a face and say 'don't quite get that one', smile and start reading another. If it didn't make sense, and she bothered doing her job properly, then surely she wouldn't have bothered to read it in the first place? It was all a bit Alan Partridge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 why did Lizzy read half an email, then pull a face and say 'don't quite get that one', smile and start reading another. If it didn't make sense, and she bothered doing her job properly, then surely she wouldn't have bothered to read it in the first place? Probably because she's a total bastard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 why did Lizzy read half an email, then pull a face and say 'don't quite get that one', smile and start reading another. If it didn't make sense, and she bothered doing her job properly, then surely she wouldn't have bothered to read it in the first place? Probably because she's a total b******. probably. Dunno why I continue to persist with this wank programme every week. All I can put it down to is that I like to moan and this provides easy pickings. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 why did Lizzy read half an email, then pull a face and say 'don't quite get that one', smile and start reading another. If it didn't make sense, and she bothered doing her job properly, then surely she wouldn't have bothered to read it in the first place? Probably because she's a total b******. probably. Dunno why I continue to persist with this w*** programme every week. All I can put it down to is that I like to moan and this provides easy pickings. Definitely, it's basically to MOTD what Newsround is to the real news. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1878 Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 http://i43.tinypic.com/2d1wtc8.jpg Alan Wiley is a bad nobhead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 Am I insane in actually liking this league programme? I really like its amateurishness, and the fact it seems to go on forever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 Am I insane in actually liking this league programme? I really like its amateurishness, and the fact it seems to go on forever. Yes, basically. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 Neil Mellor makes Kevin Nolan look anorexic. I was thinking that, he was never a chubber when he was at Liverpool was he. Yeah, he pretty much was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 oh and i wasn't fishing for compliments. I specifically asked you the question because i honestly feel you've been brainwashed by your teams style of play. I actually wanted to know if you had the audacity to say Villa (luckily you didn't). You asked the Everton lads a similar thing the other day which was clearly fishing for compliments. Take a look a few posts above for my view on our style of play. Compare that with your preaching about your team's style of play, then tell me I am the brainwashed one. Earth calling Brummie. You don't think it's a little coincidental that i'm asking fans of the teams that are competing for 4th spot? I asked the Everton fans who they prefer to get 4th spot btw (nothing about style of play). How am i supposed to know they'd say us. No i've realised you're not brainwashed now, but neither am I. We play attractive football to the neutral and you play effective football that relies on the use of good defenders and the counter attack....oh and a tall striker. What i like the best is the notion that you have the right to call me on "audacity" were i to dare to suggest we play better football than you. Are you the Judge Dredd of footballing purity or something? Awesome stuff, btw, talking about us having a "tall striker". I take it you don't actually go to your matches very often if you can't see the irony in that. And as for the "we play attractive football for the neutral" thing, what do you want me to say to that? Get on the phone to English Heritage to suggest a blue plaque down WHL? Push for UN world heritage site status for Luka Modric? And you wonder why pretty much every neutral hates Spurs with conceit like that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 Am I insane in actually liking this league programme? I really like its amateurishness, and the fact it seems to go on forever. I'd not bother with it if it wasn't for the fact we're guaranteed to be on either first or second every week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 Wew, you literally had 20 texts. Wipe out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 Wew, you literally had 20 texts. Wipe out. I bet they actually come through to a 6 year old PAYG Nokia, too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 Wew, you literally had 20 texts. Wipe out. I bet they actually come through to a 6 year old PAYG Nokia, too. The texts man, there's never any real opinions. It's ripe for parody. It's always like 'Paul from Preston has texted in and said "football is fun" keep them coming in.' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 oh and i wasn't fishing for compliments. I specifically asked you the question because i honestly feel you've been brainwashed by your teams style of play. I actually wanted to know if you had the audacity to say Villa (luckily you didn't). You asked the Everton lads a similar thing the other day which was clearly fishing for compliments. Take a look a few posts above for my view on our style of play. Compare that with your preaching about your team's style of play, then tell me I am the brainwashed one. Earth calling Brummie. You don't think it's a little coincidental that i'm asking fans of the teams that are competing for 4th spot? I asked the Everton fans who they prefer to get 4th spot btw (nothing about style of play). How am i supposed to know they'd say us. No i've realised you're not brainwashed now, but neither am I. We play attractive football to the neutral and you play effective football that relies on the use of good defenders and the counter attack....oh and a tall striker. Villa play very attractive football away from home,but as Brummie has said,the counter attacking style,which they play probably as good as anyone,is negated by sides who put men behind the ball at Villa Park. Man. City at their best,play the most eye-pleasing stuff out of the 4th place contenders imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 "Anonymous Newcastle Fan - we need to sort our defence out" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 I'm sure the BBC think that any team that isn't in the Premier League is supported only by people in deprived, working class areas. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 I've always wanted to text in pretending to be a player/member of staff from a bottom half League 2 club, purely to see if I can trick them and get it read out. Having said that, it must happen all the time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 I'm sure the BBC think that any team that isn't in the Premier League is supported only by people in deprived, working class areas. Sounds about right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 Hughton's son scored today. Tidy finish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 oh and i wasn't fishing for compliments. I specifically asked you the question because i honestly feel you've been brainwashed by your teams style of play. I actually wanted to know if you had the audacity to say Villa (luckily you didn't). You asked the Everton lads a similar thing the other day which was clearly fishing for compliments. Take a look a few posts above for my view on our style of play. Compare that with your preaching about your team's style of play, then tell me I am the brainwashed one. Earth calling Brummie. You don't think it's a little coincidental that i'm asking fans of the teams that are competing for 4th spot? I asked the Everton fans who they prefer to get 4th spot btw (nothing about style of play). How am i supposed to know they'd say us. No i've realised you're not brainwashed now, but neither am I. We play attractive football to the neutral and you play effective football that relies on the use of good defenders and the counter attack....oh and a tall striker. What i like the best is the notion that you have the right to call me on "audacity" were i to dare to suggest we play better football than you. Are you the Judge Dredd of footballing purity or something? Awesome stuff, btw, talking about us having a "tall striker". I take it you don't actually go to your matches very often if you can't see the irony in that. And as for the "we play attractive football for the neutral" thing, what do you want me to say to that? Get on the phone to English Heritage to suggest a blue plaque down WHL? Push for UN world heritage site status for Luka Modric? And you wonder why pretty much every neutral hates Spurs with conceit like that. My point was that we'd do perfectly fine without Crouch. You lot on the other hand would be totally lost without a tall striker upfront. The type of football you play will never work without the use of a tall striker. Tbh i just hate how you play. Hate it with a passion. It's repulsive football imo, but it's effective so why should MON change. Your defensive record is superb but you don't score enough goals. As has already been said on here, you literally have a plan A and that's it. Btw i noticed today that the Villa forum has a 135 page thread on us...unreal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 oh and i wasn't fishing for compliments. I specifically asked you the question because i honestly feel you've been brainwashed by your teams style of play. I actually wanted to know if you had the audacity to say Villa (luckily you didn't). You asked the Everton lads a similar thing the other day which was clearly fishing for compliments. Take a look a few posts above for my view on our style of play. Compare that with your preaching about your team's style of play, then tell me I am the brainwashed one. Earth calling Brummie. You don't think it's a little coincidental that i'm asking fans of the teams that are competing for 4th spot? I asked the Everton fans who they prefer to get 4th spot btw (nothing about style of play). How am i supposed to know they'd say us. No i've realised you're not brainwashed now, but neither am I. We play attractive football to the neutral and you play effective football that relies on the use of good defenders and the counter attack....oh and a tall striker. What i like the best is the notion that you have the right to call me on "audacity" were i to dare to suggest we play better football than you. Are you the Judge Dredd of footballing purity or something? Awesome stuff, btw, talking about us having a "tall striker". I take it you don't actually go to your matches very often if you can't see the irony in that. And as for the "we play attractive football for the neutral" thing, what do you want me to say to that? Get on the phone to English Heritage to suggest a blue plaque down WHL? Push for UN world heritage site status for Luka Modric? And you wonder why pretty much every neutral hates Spurs with conceit like that. My point was that we'd do perfectly fine without Crouch. You lot on the other hand would be totally lost without a tall striker upfront. The type of football you play will never work without the use of a tall striker. Tbh i just hate how you play. Hate it with a passion. It's repulsive football imo, but it's effective so why should MON change. Your defensive record is superb but you don't score enough goals. As has already been said on here, you literally have a plan A and that's it. Btw i noticed today that the Villa forum has a 135 page thread on us...unreal. Fucking hell, holier than thou wot wot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 oh and i wasn't fishing for compliments. I specifically asked you the question because i honestly feel you've been brainwashed by your teams style of play. I actually wanted to know if you had the audacity to say Villa (luckily you didn't). You asked the Everton lads a similar thing the other day which was clearly fishing for compliments. Take a look a few posts above for my view on our style of play. Compare that with your preaching about your team's style of play, then tell me I am the brainwashed one. Earth calling Brummie. You don't think it's a little coincidental that i'm asking fans of the teams that are competing for 4th spot? I asked the Everton fans who they prefer to get 4th spot btw (nothing about style of play). How am i supposed to know they'd say us. No i've realised you're not brainwashed now, but neither am I. We play attractive football to the neutral and you play effective football that relies on the use of good defenders and the counter attack....oh and a tall striker. What i like the best is the notion that you have the right to call me on "audacity" were i to dare to suggest we play better football than you. Are you the Judge Dredd of footballing purity or something? Awesome stuff, btw, talking about us having a "tall striker". I take it you don't actually go to your matches very often if you can't see the irony in that. And as for the "we play attractive football for the neutral" thing, what do you want me to say to that? Get on the phone to English Heritage to suggest a blue plaque down WHL? Push for UN world heritage site status for Luka Modric? And you wonder why pretty much every neutral hates Spurs with conceit like that. My point was that we'd do perfectly fine without Crouch. You lot on the other hand would be totally lost without a tall striker upfront. The type of football you play will never work without the use of a tall striker. Tbh i just hate how you play. Hate it with a passion. It's repulsive football imo, but it's effective so why should MON change. Your defensive record is superb but you don't score enough goals. As has already been said on here, you literally have a plan A and that's it. Btw i noticed today that the Villa forum has a 135 page thread on us...unreal. f***ing hell, holier than thou wot wot. I'm first to put my hand up when we play s**** or when a player isn't performing. We're on a great run of form with practically half our starting X1 out (and loads of subs). We're grinding out results and still playing good football. Villa play similar football to Stoke (in that they both literally only have a plan A) and never get criticised. Brummie was first to say on here how he thinks Villa will win the FA cup (league cup also i think) so i can boast a little too. Plus Brummie was pointing out to me how we don't put up much of a fight against the top 4 (which is true 100%). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 oh and i wasn't fishing for compliments. I specifically asked you the question because i honestly feel you've been brainwashed by your teams style of play. I actually wanted to know if you had the audacity to say Villa (luckily you didn't). You asked the Everton lads a similar thing the other day which was clearly fishing for compliments. Take a look a few posts above for my view on our style of play. Compare that with your preaching about your team's style of play, then tell me I am the brainwashed one. Earth calling Brummie. You don't think it's a little coincidental that i'm asking fans of the teams that are competing for 4th spot? I asked the Everton fans who they prefer to get 4th spot btw (nothing about style of play). How am i supposed to know they'd say us. No i've realised you're not brainwashed now, but neither am I. We play attractive football to the neutral and you play effective football that relies on the use of good defenders and the counter attack....oh and a tall striker. What i like the best is the notion that you have the right to call me on "audacity" were i to dare to suggest we play better football than you. Are you the Judge Dredd of footballing purity or something? Awesome stuff, btw, talking about us having a "tall striker". I take it you don't actually go to your matches very often if you can't see the irony in that. And as for the "we play attractive football for the neutral" thing, what do you want me to say to that? Get on the phone to English Heritage to suggest a blue plaque down WHL? Push for UN world heritage site status for Luka Modric? And you wonder why pretty much every neutral hates Spurs with conceit like that. My point was that we'd do perfectly fine without Crouch. You lot on the other hand would be totally lost without a tall striker upfront. The type of football you play will never work without the use of a tall striker. Tbh i just hate how you play. Hate it with a passion. It's repulsive football imo, but it's effective so why should MON change. Your defensive record is superb but you don't score enough goals. As has already been said on here, you literally have a plan A and that's it. Btw i noticed today that the Villa forum has a 135 page thread on us...unreal. f***ing hell, holier than thou wot wot. I'm first to put my hand up when we play s**** or when a player isn't performing. We're on a great run of form with practically half our starting X1 out (and loads of subs). We're grinding out results and still playing good football. Villa play similar football to Stoke (in that they both literally only have a plan A) and never get criticised. Brummie was first to say on here how he thinks Villa will win the FA cup (league cup also i think) so i can boast a little too. Plus Brummie was pointing out to me how we don't put up much of a fight against the top 4 (which is true 100%). It just seems like your going over and over the points that Brummie has agreed with, going further each time to make Spurs seem more like Barcelona (obviously an exaggeration) in comparison. Whether it's self congratulatory, or to get people to agree with you, or whatever Im not sure, perhaps you'll disagree, that's just what it seems like. You play nice football, but I don't think you exactly have any more of a diverse plan than Villa's in fact, they're similar as far as I can see. Spurs play better football, but to me that's purely a product of you having better players, not better tactics...that's probably the same reason I think that at their best, Man City play the better football, because they have a few players that are better than yours imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 oh and i wasn't fishing for compliments. I specifically asked you the question because i honestly feel you've been brainwashed by your teams style of play. I actually wanted to know if you had the audacity to say Villa (luckily you didn't). You asked the Everton lads a similar thing the other day which was clearly fishing for compliments. Take a look a few posts above for my view on our style of play. Compare that with your preaching about your team's style of play, then tell me I am the brainwashed one. Earth calling Brummie. You don't think it's a little coincidental that i'm asking fans of the teams that are competing for 4th spot? I asked the Everton fans who they prefer to get 4th spot btw (nothing about style of play). How am i supposed to know they'd say us. No i've realised you're not brainwashed now, but neither am I. We play attractive football to the neutral and you play effective football that relies on the use of good defenders and the counter attack....oh and a tall striker. What i like the best is the notion that you have the right to call me on "audacity" were i to dare to suggest we play better football than you. Are you the Judge Dredd of footballing purity or something? Awesome stuff, btw, talking about us having a "tall striker". I take it you don't actually go to your matches very often if you can't see the irony in that. And as for the "we play attractive football for the neutral" thing, what do you want me to say to that? Get on the phone to English Heritage to suggest a blue plaque down WHL? Push for UN world heritage site status for Luka Modric? And you wonder why pretty much every neutral hates Spurs with conceit like that. My point was that we'd do perfectly fine without Crouch. You lot on the other hand would be totally lost without a tall striker upfront. The type of football you play will never work without the use of a tall striker. Tbh i just hate how you play. Hate it with a passion. It's repulsive football imo, but it's effective so why should MON change. Your defensive record is superb but you don't score enough goals. As has already been said on here, you literally have a plan A and that's it. Btw i noticed today that the Villa forum has a 135 page thread on us...unreal. f***ing hell, holier than thou wot wot. I'm first to put my hand up when we play s**** or when a player isn't performing. We're on a great run of form with practically half our starting X1 out (and loads of subs). We're grinding out results and still playing good football. Villa play similar football to Stoke (in that they both literally only have a plan A) and never get criticised. Brummie was first to say on here how he thinks Villa will win the FA cup (league cup also i think) so i can boast a little too. Plus Brummie was pointing out to me how we don't put up much of a fight against the top 4 (which is true 100%). It just seems like your going over and over the points that Brummie has agreed with, going further each time to make Spurs seem more like Barcelona (obviously an exaggeration) in comparison. Whether it's self congratulatory, or to get people to agree with you, or whatever Im not sure, perhaps you'll disagree, that's just what it seems like. You play nice football, but I don't think you exactly have any more of a diverse plan than Villa's in fact, they're similar as far as I can see. Spurs play better football, but to me that's purely a product of you having better players, not better tactics...that's probably the same reason I think that at their best, Man City play the better football, because they have a few players that are better than yours imo. Yeh he's agreeing with me on this occasion tbh. We had this discussion before and his responses were different so maybe that's why i'm repeating myself (that and i'm merely trying to counter his responses). When things were not going so well Brummie points out all our inadequacies (which are mostly true). I think i'm allowed to do the same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 21, 2010 Share Posted March 21, 2010 oh and i wasn't fishing for compliments. I specifically asked you the question because i honestly feel you've been brainwashed by your teams style of play. I actually wanted to know if you had the audacity to say Villa (luckily you didn't). You asked the Everton lads a similar thing the other day which was clearly fishing for compliments. Take a look a few posts above for my view on our style of play. Compare that with your preaching about your team's style of play, then tell me I am the brainwashed one. Earth calling Brummie. You don't think it's a little coincidental that i'm asking fans of the teams that are competing for 4th spot? I asked the Everton fans who they prefer to get 4th spot btw (nothing about style of play). How am i supposed to know they'd say us. No i've realised you're not brainwashed now, but neither am I. We play attractive football to the neutral and you play effective football that relies on the use of good defenders and the counter attack....oh and a tall striker. What i like the best is the notion that you have the right to call me on "audacity" were i to dare to suggest we play better football than you. Are you the Judge Dredd of footballing purity or something? Awesome stuff, btw, talking about us having a "tall striker". I take it you don't actually go to your matches very often if you can't see the irony in that. And as for the "we play attractive football for the neutral" thing, what do you want me to say to that? Get on the phone to English Heritage to suggest a blue plaque down WHL? Push for UN world heritage site status for Luka Modric? And you wonder why pretty much every neutral hates Spurs with conceit like that. My point was that we'd do perfectly fine without Crouch. You lot on the other hand would be totally lost without a tall striker upfront. The type of football you play will never work without the use of a tall striker. Tbh i just hate how you play. Hate it with a passion. It's repulsive football imo, but it's effective so why should MON change. Your defensive record is superb but you don't score enough goals. As has already been said on here, you literally have a plan A and that's it. Btw i noticed today that the Villa forum has a 135 page thread on us...unreal. f***ing hell, holier than thou wot wot. I'm first to put my hand up when we play s**** or when a player isn't performing. We're on a great run of form with practically half our starting X1 out (and loads of subs). We're grinding out results and still playing good football. Villa play similar football to Stoke (in that they both literally only have a plan A) and never get criticised. Brummie was first to say on here how he thinks Villa will win the FA cup (league cup also i think) so i can boast a little too. Plus Brummie was pointing out to me how we don't put up much of a fight against the top 4 (which is true 100%). It just seems like your going over and over the points that Brummie has agreed with, going further each time to make Spurs seem more like Barcelona (obviously an exaggeration) in comparison. Whether it's self congratulatory, or to get people to agree with you, or whatever Im not sure, perhaps you'll disagree, that's just what it seems like. You play nice football, but I don't think you exactly have any more of a diverse plan than Villa's in fact, they're similar as far as I can see. Spurs play better football, but to me that's purely a product of you having better players, not better tactics...that's probably the same reason I think that at their best, Man City play the better football, because they have a few players that are better than yours imo. Yeh he's agreeing with me on this occasion tbh. We had this discussion before and his responses were different so maybe that's why i'm repeating myself (that and i'm merely trying to counter his responses). When things were not going so well Brummie points out all our inadequacies (which are mostly true). I think i'm allowed to do the same. No bother, makes sense. Any news on when you're getting a DM like Gareth Barry? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts