ShearMagic Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Yeah, read 1 or 2 people on that social networking tool that nobody likes. Nothing concrete obviously, apologies for not stating beforehand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rons Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 It could be this: http://www.sportsvibe.co.uk/news/football/newcastle-prepare-to-make-move-for-9-5m-rated-african-star-striker-10138/? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 £9.5m, aye areet then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Credible source. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 "One thing I do know is that the bench looks stronger. From the bench I can change the game." wow, amazing - he's clearly not even lying here here really changed shit up against arsenal twat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 "One thing I do know is that the bench looks stronger. From the bench I can change the game." wow, amazing - he's clearly not even lying here here really changed shit up against arsenal twat He did though, he brought on Obertan and he played well and nearly set up the winner for Cabaye. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 "One thing I do know is that the bench looks stronger. From the bench I can change the game." wow, amazing - he's clearly not even lying here here really changed shit up against arsenal twat He did though, he brought on Obertan and he played well and nearly set up the winner for Cabaye. Doesn't particularly inspire me that the way he changed it was to bin his own new star striker and Carroll replacement after 45 minutes for being shite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 "One thing I do know is that the bench looks stronger. From the bench I can change the game." wow, amazing - he's clearly not even lying here here really changed shit up against arsenal twat He did though, he brought on Obertan and he played well and nearly set up the winner for Cabaye. Doesn't particularly inspire me that the way he changed it was to bin his own new star striker and Carroll replacement after 45 minutes for being shite. the arsenal point wasn't about the change he made, it was about the change he didn't make sad that needs explaining really Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertCommunicator Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 I'd like to think that Ba isn't the Carroll replacement, but our future 2nd striker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 I'd like to think that Ba isn't the Carroll replacement, but our future 2nd striker. class, if only you were a right wing racist nutjob you'f be the whole package Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 "One thing I do know is that the bench looks stronger. From the bench I can change the game." wow, amazing - he's clearly not even lying here here really changed shit up against arsenal twat He did though, he brought on Obertan and he played well and nearly set up the winner for Cabaye. Doesn't particularly inspire me that the way he changed it was to bin his own new star striker and Carroll replacement after 45 minutes for being shite. the arsenal point wasn't about the change he made, it was about the change he didn't make sad that needs explaining really It isn't about who he brought off, why should that matter? He recognised that the 4-4-2 wasn't working and the strikers were isolated, so he brought one of them off and added Obertan to link the attacks a bit more. Maybe he should have brought Shola off, I would have done, but he made a good change FFS. I don't know what you mean about the "change he didn't make", sorry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 "One thing I do know is that the bench looks stronger. From the bench I can change the game." wow, amazing - he's clearly not even lying here here really changed shit up against arsenal twat He did though, he brought on Obertan and he played well and nearly set up the winner for Cabaye. Doesn't particularly inspire me that the way he changed it was to bin his own new star striker and Carroll replacement after 45 minutes for being shite. the arsenal point wasn't about the change he made, it was about the change he didn't make sad that needs explaining really It isn't about who he brought off, why should that matter? He recognised that the 4-4-2 wasn't working and the strikers were isolated, so he brought one of them off and added Obertan to link the attacks a bit more. Maybe he should have brought Shola off, I would have done, but he made a good change FFS. I don't know what you mean about the "change he didn't make", sorry. shola was the change he didn't make, nothing untoward - i prefer giving yourself a chance to win in football, just me mind Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 "One thing I do know is that the bench looks stronger. From the bench I can change the game." wow, amazing - he's clearly not even lying here here really changed shit up against arsenal twat He did though, he brought on Obertan and he played well and nearly set up the winner for Cabaye. Doesn't particularly inspire me that the way he changed it was to bin his own new star striker and Carroll replacement after 45 minutes for being shite. the arsenal point wasn't about the change he made, it was about the change he didn't make sad that needs explaining really It isn't about who he brought off, why should that matter? He recognised that the 4-4-2 wasn't working and the strikers were isolated, so he brought one of them off and added Obertan to link the attacks a bit more. Maybe he should have brought Shola off, I would have done, but he made a good change FFS. I don't know what you mean about the "change he didn't make", sorry. They weren't so much 'isolated' as 'crap'. Always thought substitutions are overstated as part of a manager's matchday duties. He should be getting it right from the off, that includes buying the right players to go into the match with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Fair enough, I was just responding to the point that he couldn't change the game from the bench, something that he clearly did do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 I'd like to think that Ba isn't the Carroll replacement, but our future 2nd striker. class, if only you were a right wing racist nutjob you'f be the whole package Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 "One thing I do know is that the bench looks stronger. From the bench I can change the game." wow, amazing - he's clearly not even lying here here really changed shit up against arsenal twat He did though, he brought on Obertan and he played well and nearly set up the winner for Cabaye. Doesn't particularly inspire me that the way he changed it was to bin his own new star striker and Carroll replacement after 45 minutes for being shite. the arsenal point wasn't about the change he made, it was about the change he didn't make sad that needs explaining really It isn't about who he brought off, why should that matter? He recognised that the 4-4-2 wasn't working and the strikers were isolated, so he brought one of them off and added Obertan to link the attacks a bit more. Maybe he should have brought Shola off, I would have done, but he made a good change FFS. I don't know what you mean about the "change he didn't make", sorry. shola was the change he didn't make, nothing untoward - i prefer giving yourself a chance to win in football, just me mind Can you not just respond without the heavy sarcasm? It's borderline at best whether Ba or Shola coming off would give us the best chance to win. I've already said I would have brought Shola off, but to pretend it's clear cut is stupid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Fair enough, I was just responding to the point that he couldn't change the game from the bench, something that he clearly did do. he fucking picked shola to start man, minutes in it was clear it was an awful decision yet he takes off his own signing ba - laughable man stooge, puppet, fuckwit imo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Fair enough, I was just responding to the point that he couldn't change the game from the bench, something that he clearly did do. he fucking picked shola to start man, minutes in it was clear it was an awful decision yet he takes off his own signing ba - laughable man stooge, puppet, fuckwit imo See my post above. And go easy on the drink, it's only just after five. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 shola was the change he didn't make, nothing untoward - i prefer giving yourself a chance to win in football, just me mind Can you not just respond without the heavy sarcasm? It's borderline at best whether Ba or Shola coming off would give us the best chance to win. I've already said I would have brought Shola off, but to pretend it's clear cut is stupid. that was the least sarcastic thing i posted man, to me from the moment the game started it was cleat cut shola was the wrong choice - said it at the time and repeatedly as he fucked every single thing he tried up dunno man, don't know what you want me to say? the "apologists" tell me i have to accept ba as a real signing rather than a 10m signing...if ba had cost us 10, 15, 20m would anyone accept shola ahead of him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Fair enough, I was just responding to the point that he couldn't change the game from the bench, something that he clearly did do. he fucking picked shola to start man, minutes in it was clear it was an awful decision yet he takes off his own signing ba - laughable man stooge, puppet, fuckwit imo See my post above. And go easy on the drink, it's only just after five. He's in my time zone man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Fair enough, I was just responding to the point that he couldn't change the game from the bench, something that he clearly did do. he fucking picked shola to start man, minutes in it was clear it was an awful decision yet he takes off his own signing ba - laughable man stooge, puppet, fuckwit imo See my post above. And go easy on the drink, it's only just after five. not where i am Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 dunno man, don't know what you want me to say? the "apologists" tell me i have to accept ba as a real signing rather than a 10m signing...if ba had cost us 10, 15, 20m would anyone accept shola ahead of him? Very interesting question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Don't think anyone is saying Shola is better than Ba. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Don't think anyone is saying Shola is better than Ba. ah ma, i daren't even ask - what are you saying then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Don't think anyone is saying Shola is better than Ba. ah ma, i daren't even ask - what are you saying then? Just that Pardew did change the game from the bench by introducing Obertan, that was the debate we were having. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now