Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. I don’t think it was really about ‘breaking them down’ exactly. We didn’t even do the pre-work you need to be in a position to break someone down. Positive is that I assume we got to a stage where we decided that a point would be OK and we stuck on that.
  2. But what’s the actual rule about when VAR should be used?
  3. Nobody expected it to be easy for England though, surely.
  4. I just don’t think they’re competing for the same role. That said, Mount was also poor so midfield positions are up for grabs. I’d be up for playing Bellingham or even Henderson TBH, or move Mount back.
  5. Kane mustn’t be fit, he’s nowhere near the play. You’d be mad to spend £100m+ on him now.
  6. I don’t think Rice and Philips was that bad a selection, they just played bad. They didn’t carry the ball or move it like they’re capable of. That said, I would’ve changed them second half. Think Rice made his first tackle in the 92nd minute.
  7. I don’t understand the use of VAR in this tournament. Don’t get why they just don’t check penalties. It’s like they know VAR is bad so they’ve decided not to use it.
  8. Thought it looked fun as well, but I've never watched.
  9. AyeDubbleYoo


    It'll be fine, most people don't experience anything at all.
  10. Don't think it's particularly those on the left at all.
  11. Yeah, as nice as it is to see the Tories get beat, not so great if it's just about objecting to those specific policies. Shows the weird difference between bi-elections and general mind. I always wondered what parliament would look like if there were no general elections and everyone voted for their local MP at different times. Not the most practical, I know.
  12. I’d be up for disregarding NUFC fixtures completely TBH.
  13. AyeDubbleYoo


    Admissions have been 100-150 for quite a while.
  • Create New...