Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

AyeDubbleYoo
23 minutes ago, 54 said:

20230620_135934.jpg


Really is outrageous how badly they’ve spent that money :lol:

 

Guess it’s as much to do with the lack of plan and structure as the players themselves. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The College Dropout
4 hours ago, Solitude20 said:


Read my post again. Chelsea did the exact same thing 12 months ago, and I gave examples for worse deals by other teams. So the idea that only Saudi does that isn’t true. 
 

He was literally sold at book value. 

 

 

 

I don’t get your point then. 
 

The others might be bad transfers. But Chelsea will be the only team to get all of their money back and all of the wages off the books. Maguire will be let go for free and likely with his wages subsidised for the remainder of us Man U contract. Lukaku was loaned out and some of his wages subsidised, as he’s not going to Saudi - Chelsea will have to do something similar again or keep him.  
 

 

Koulibali would be the best defender in Saudi.  I’m not criticising what it might bring the Saudi league - I’m criticising what it will bring Chelsea, nobody else would offer it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

AyeDubbleYoo

Yeah, the players are mostly saleable and good players, Chelsea would just normally have to take a much bigger hit to get them out the door. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Gaztoon said:

90m bid rejected for rice from arsenal.

 

Ooof. I think that's probably a good bid if it's all guaranteed coin and not dependent on CL/PL titles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Gaztoon said:

90m bid rejected for rice from arsenal.

Weren't hammers pushing for 150 or was I dreaming

Link to post
Share on other sites

AyeDubbleYoo

Have to be looking at a deal like Enzo to Chelsea as a similar situation, I suppose. 

 

Obviously Chelsea are deranged, but if I was West Ham I would be mentioning it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, toon25 said:

 

Ooof. I think that's probably a good bid if it's all guaranteed coin and not dependent on CL/PL titles.

 

West ham will want atleast 110m

Link to post
Share on other sites

Armchair Pundit
4 hours ago, 54 said:

20230620_135934.jpg

 

I'm still confused as to how they're getting past the FFP rules and still spending big money on transfers this window.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Armchair Pundit said:

 

I'm still confused as to how they're getting past the FFP rules and still spending big money on transfers this window.


Wasn’t everything cleared when Todd bought them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

GeordieDazzler
27 minutes ago, Armchair Pundit said:

 

I'm still confused as to how they're getting past the FFP rules and still spending big money on transfers this window.


for thousandth time, they are pretty much the only one of the big 6 who consistently sell players for good money, 400m or so in the 5 years prior to the takeover, that plus the allowable losses mean they are fine with FFP. 
 

They’re gonna make 200m+ this window from sales so again will be fine. 
 

As raised earlier Arsenals ability to spend 200m odd every window with precious little from sales is more interesting. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gaztoon said:

 

West ham will want atleast 110m

Crazy money. I don't think he's worth that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OverThere said:

Crazy money. I don't think he's worth that.

Man Utd and Chelsea have fucked the market so hard to gauge an accurate valuation now

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Prophet

N-O would be fully melting down if we'd had two bid knocked back for our primary target. It shows it's par for the course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OverThere said:

Crazy money. I don't think he's worth that.

To put it into perspective:      Rice= Maddison + Szobozlai 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Caleb70 said:

To put it into perspective:      Rice= Maddison + Szobozlai 

Which also equals roughly 50% of Maguire, Sancho and Wan-Bissaka

Link to post
Share on other sites

With these fees, the most important man at NUFC is fast becoming Dan Ashworth and his ability to set up a scouting network and create an academy 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he costs £100m, they'll not have to spend on that position again for about 10-12 years. He's worth every penny for me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

If he costs £100m, they'll not have to spend on that position again for about 10-12 years. He's worth every penny for me. 

He's 25 in January, so unless he can still tear up an down at 37....

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OverThere said:

He's 25 in January, so unless he can still tear up an down at 37....

 

I could see him doing it that long, he seems in good nick and like he'd look after himself. He's 10x the player Henderson is/was and he's still a big member of the England and Liverpool squads at 33. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unbelievable
14 minutes ago, OverThere said:

With these fees, the most important man at NUFC is fast becoming Dan Ashworth and his ability to set up a scouting network and create an academy 

Always was. Well, him and Howe for improving players individually and making them more than the sum of their parts together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, OverThere said:

Crazy money. I don't think he's worth that.

 

Agreed

 

Money today is crazy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...