loki679 Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Way to miss the point, Francis. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 I was addressing the general notion of judging or expectations based on transfer fees, not the tweet's purpose of showing they're (City v Liverpool) are generally equal. Okay, Jimmy? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 Don’t particularly like Neville but I like this. https://twitter.com/gnev2/status/1126839895526445056?s=21 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 Liverpool have been tremendous in the transfer market and every deal for the last few years looks like a good deal. Excellent business all round. But they do have the most expensive GK and CB in the world. City have bought welll but they haven’t been as smart. Liverpool have made sure to sign their first targets no matter the cost. But sometimes their first target is £10m and severely under rated with a high ceiling. City spent 60m on Mahrez. He’s a top player but they barely use him. He’d be closer to Liverpool’s XI Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 City had a higher bar as well though, they were trying to improve on what was already the best team by a mile. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 Easier to upgrade on the likes of Mignolet, Lovren, Moreno & Sturridge over the last two seasons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now