Guest Brazilianbob Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 W Ham bid £18m for Bent!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Ridiculous fee, smacks of desperation.... Surprised it's not us tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 W Ham bid £18m for Bent!! Where? What? You have to be kidding me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Knightrider Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Curbishley's reputation as a miracle worker, will go when he takes West Ham down. Madness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 http://home.skysports.com/list.aspx?hlid=445003&CPID=8&clid=33&lid=2&title=ADDICKS+REJECT+HUGE+BENT+BID Indeed, an £18m bid - even madder than that, it has been rejected by Charlton! MJ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Rejected!?!?! Fantastic news, leaves us just enough time for our £22 million pound bid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Mental. Curbs has lost it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elbee909 Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 I just remember how much he could have been bought for when Ipswich were in trouble. Sigh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooneyToonArmy Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 ridiculous, but that's what yu have to pay for an english player, overinflated prices 18m Carrick? 12m Bale? 18m Darren Bent? 12m Walcott? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eyeball_tickler Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 very stupid move considering they are just getting a player back from injury who is better than bent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Emre05 Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Ashton and Bent would have been a great partnership too /!!! although if they go down then there would probably an escape clause Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 ridiculous, but that's what yu have to pay for an english player, overinflated prices 18m Carrick? 12m Bale? 18m Darren Bent? 12m Walcott? 17 for Owen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Fucking hell. It's insane West Ham would bid £18 million and even crazier by Charlton to reject it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 How desperate are those nasty spammers. 18 million for Darrent Bent is a total rip-off. Apparantly Bent didnt even want to go there anyway . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooneyToonArmy Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 ridiculous, but that's what yu have to pay for an english player, overinflated prices 18m Carrick? 12m Bale? 18m Darren Bent? 12m Walcott? 17 for Owen maybe so to an extent but at the very least Owen is a proven world class player on every stage (apart from injury obviously)......Carrick, Bent are average IMO and Walcott and Bale are just potential Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 i know and i fully agree. All way overpriced still tho. id love if it if he moved and Charlton stayed up at expense of WHU Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 i know and i fully agree. All way overpriced still tho. id love if it if he moved and Charlton stayed up at expense of WHU Yep that would be great Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Do you think this could be why we haven't signed anyone, absolutely crazy prices. I mean if Charlton asking more than £18 million for Bent how much are all the other clubs gonna be asking for there players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Do you think this could be why we haven't signed anyone, absolutely crazy prices. I mean if Charlton asking more than £18 million for Bent how much are all the other clubs gonna be asking for there players. nah but it is a good excuse to use. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Do you think this could be why we haven't signed anyone, absolutely crazy prices. I mean if Charlton asking more than £18 million for Bent how much are all the other clubs gonna be asking for there players. So don't go for young English players then. Liverpool and Tottenham seem to be picking up good foreign defenders for considerably less. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sniffer Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Hmmm......Luque, one of the top six players in Spain at 10 mill or Darren Bent at 18 mill? No contest really because we could get Luque and use the 8 mill for Boumsoong, a top frog defender. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Charlton Chairman denying that there's been a bid from Wist 'am. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toptoon Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 £18m for Bent and its refused mackems.gif what is the world coming to?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 very stupid move considering they are just getting a player back from injury who is better than bent. Bent is better than Ashton tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toptoon Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Hmmm......Luque, one of the top six players in Spain at 10 mill or Darren Bent at 18 mill? No contest really because we could get Luque and use the 8 mill for Boumsoong, a top frog defender. Neither! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now