Dinho lad Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 Reo-Coker? No bloody thanks! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 I'd certainly have Reo-Coker at £5m. Slightly less of a gamble in that case, even though it is quite a lot of money. I think we'll need a centre-midfielder in the summer. Emre's injury prone, Butt's getting on a bit, Parker's inconsistent and Dyer simply isn't a midfielder anymore. £5m for Reo-Coker would certainly do that job and i wouldn't be unhappy to see him here. He needs a fresh start, desperately. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ridzuan Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 I think Reo Coker would be a good buy and the price is right for me I think.He has been great for West Ham for most of the season and Im sure he will be a great addition to our squad.As for Owen,I doubt any move of him going to other clubs,in particular Liverpool will happen.If it does,Im going to hate him for my entire life. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
juniatmoko Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 ???no..no...no.. not Rice-Cooker again even Wet Spam fans doesn't rate him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 £5m for Reo-Coker? Fucks sake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 Reo-Coker looked far better than Parker in the game up here a few weeks ago, his problem with the West Ham fans is that they're shit this season and he's getting the blame because he's captain. I'd take him at £5 million and look to move Parker on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 Owen is a professional and would not leave us having played so few games. Plus i dont think liverpool would want him. Owen is a mercenary and will go (or stay) wherever the pay is the most. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 £5m plus Bellamy for Owen and I'm all ears. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kenton Magpie Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 Owen is by far a much better player than Bellamy will ever hope to be, I'd rather have a player who is almost certain to score at every chance than a player who's rate of scoring during a game is one every 6-7 chances Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 If we could get Yakubu then I'd let Owen go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 Reo-Coker looked far better than Parker in the game up here a few weeks ago, his problem with the West Ham fans is that they're shit this season and he's getting the blame because he's captain. I'd take him at £5 million and look to move Parker on. The same could be said about Parker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 Reo-Coker looked far better than Parker in the game up here a few weeks ago, his problem with the West Ham fans is that they're s*** this season and he's getting the blame because he's captain. I'd take him at £5 million and look to move Parker on. The same could be said about Parker. Except West Ham don't play better when Reo-Coker is out, unlike us who look far better as a team when Parker is missing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Butt I will rather have Reo-Cocker as a replasement for Parka I'm going to use the same argument you use about Parker. One good season, tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 Reo-Coker looked far better than Parker in the game up here a few weeks ago, his problem with the West Ham fans is that they're s*** this season and he's getting the blame because he's captain. I'd take him at £5 million and look to move Parker on. The same could be said about Parker. Except West Ham don't play better when Reo-Coker is out, unlike us who look far better as a team when Parker is missing. And how do you know west ham don't play better without NRC? They've been shit all season! Remind me again.....Parker was playing yeasterday and against Arsenal at The Emirates, no? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmonkey Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 If we could get Yakubu then I'd let Owen go. I would hope we could do better than Yakubu. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
danny_nufc Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 if it's true Joey Bartons got a 5.5 million release clause id take him over Reo-Coker in the summer. He's twice the player. Managed to shine and score goals in a piss-poor city side, while reo-cokers done fuck all this season, except trying to get Pardew the sack (allegedly.) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 Reo-Coker looked far better than Parker in the game up here a few weeks ago, his problem with the West Ham fans is that they're s*** this season and he's getting the blame because he's captain. I'd take him at £5 million and look to move Parker on. The same could be said about Parker. Except West Ham don't play better when Reo-Coker is out, unlike us who look far better as a team when Parker is missing. And how do you know west ham don't play better without NRC? They've been s*** all season! Remind me again.....Parker was playing yeasterday and against Arsenal at The Emirates, no? So because he played yesterday in a game we didn't deserve to win proves my point wrong? The best football we've played in the last 2 years has been when Parker has been out, at the end of last season when we went on our run to qualify for Europe and early December when we had Butt and Emre in midfiled. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papo Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 how much would we get for Emre? more than 5m? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 Would rather bring in Barton, proven more at Premiership level and probably open to a move away from City. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
juniatmoko Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 If we could get Yakubu then I'd let Owen go. I would hope we could do better than Yakubu. Agree tbh. Yakubu not a team player kind Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
womblemaster Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 would take 22m for owen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 Reo-Coker looked far better than Parker in the game up here a few weeks ago, his problem with the West Ham fans is that they're s*** this season and he's getting the blame because he's captain. I'd take him at £5 million and look to move Parker on. The same could be said about Parker. Except West Ham don't play better when Reo-Coker is out, unlike us who look far better as a team when Parker is missing. And how do you know west ham don't play better without NRC? They've been s*** all season! Remind me again.....Parker was playing yeasterday and against Arsenal at The Emirates, no? So because he played yesterday in a game we didn't deserve to win proves my point wrong? The best football we've played in the last 2 years has been when Parker has been out, at the end of last season when we went on our run to qualify for Europe and early December when we had Butt and Emre in midfiled. 100% true but you're wasting your time. The fan boys won't turn until he's gone, then they'll be saying how shite he was like they do about Jeenarse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Knightrider Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 I'd have Reo-Coker at SJP like, I've changed my mind on him, but I'd rather we prioritised other positions first, he's the type of player your buy when you can afford to spend so much money on a squad player, but we aren't in that position just yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 Reo-Coker looked far better than Parker in the game up here a few weeks ago, his problem with the West Ham fans is that they're s*** this season and he's getting the blame because he's captain. I'd take him at £5 million and look to move Parker on. The same could be said about Parker. Except West Ham don't play better when Reo-Coker is out, unlike us who look far better as a team when Parker is missing. And how do you know west ham don't play better without NRC? They've been s*** all season! Remind me again.....Parker was playing yeasterday and against Arsenal at The Emirates, no? So because he played yesterday in a game we didn't deserve to win proves my point wrong? The best football we've played in the last 2 years has been when Parker has been out, at the end of last season when we went on our run to qualify for Europe and early December when we had Butt and Emre in midfiled. Nothing to do with Souness leaving? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 Reo-Coker looked far better than Parker in the game up here a few weeks ago, his problem with the West Ham fans is that they're s*** this season and he's getting the blame because he's captain. I'd take him at £5 million and look to move Parker on. The same could be said about Parker. Except West Ham don't play better when Reo-Coker is out, unlike us who look far better as a team when Parker is missing. And how do you know west ham don't play better without NRC? They've been s*** all season! Remind me again.....Parker was playing yeasterday and against Arsenal at The Emirates, no? So because he played yesterday in a game we didn't deserve to win proves my point wrong? The best football we've played in the last 2 years has been when Parker has been out, at the end of last season when we went on our run to qualify for Europe and early December when we had Butt and Emre in midfiled. 100% true but you're wasting your time. The fan boys won't turn until he's gone, then they'll be saying how shite he was like they do about Jeenarse. Talking shite as usual. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now