junkhead Posted April 3, 2007 Share Posted April 3, 2007 Dyer plays better as a second striker than he does in midfield. I'm sorry but I completely disagree, not that he is brilliant in midfield, but his performances in recent games as a striker have proven that he isn't a natural or even good striker - he doesn't have the natural positional instincts of a striker nor the finishing of a striker. He would be ideal as a player behind the front two but I worry when people think of Dyer as a striker. Once Owen comes i'd like our formation to be: Dyer (ss) Owen Martins (ss) = Second striker What music would you like to accompany this? Cypress Hill - 3 Lil' Putos Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted April 3, 2007 Share Posted April 3, 2007 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shearer_united Posted April 3, 2007 Share Posted April 3, 2007 Dyer plays better as a second striker than he does in midfield. I'm sorry but I completely disagree, not that he is brilliant in midfield, but his performances in recent games as a striker have proven that he isn't a natural or even good striker - he doesn't have the natural positional instincts of a striker nor the finishing of a striker. He would be ideal as a player behind the front two but I worry when people think of Dyer as a striker. Once Owen comes i'd like our formation to be: Dyer (ss) Owen Martins (ss) = Second striker What music would you like to accompany this? Hey Shearer song !!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NSMagpie Posted April 3, 2007 Share Posted April 3, 2007 Maybe so, but if Shola had played the whole season I'd have tipped him to bag 15-20 easily. (didn't he already have 7 by October?) I'm not confident Chopra would do at this level. If Shola ever scores 20 goals in a Premiership season, just let me know, please. That 'won't happen, ever. But, problem with Ameobi is not solely in his ability or disability to score. Problem is that when you're playing with him in the team it looks like you have one player less on the pitch. His control of the ball is awful, and so is his ability to pass and colaborate with the other striker and midfielders. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted April 3, 2007 Share Posted April 3, 2007 Maybe so, but if Shola had played the whole season I'd have tipped him to bag 15-20 easily. (didn't he already have 7 by October?) I'm not confident Chopra would do at this level. If Shola ever scores 20 goals in a Premiership season, just let me know, please. That 'won't happen, ever. But, problem with Ameobi is not solely in his ability or disability to score. Problem is that when you're playing with him in the team it looks like you have one player less on the pitch. His control of the ball is awful, and so is his ability to pass and colaborate with the other striker and midfielders. I thought we were talking about Shola here, not Martins... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 It seems that Shola is the one we should rely on-----for our relegation battle next season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NSMagpie Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Maybe so, but if Shola had played the whole season I'd have tipped him to bag 15-20 easily. (didn't he already have 7 by October?) I'm not confident Chopra would do at this level. If Shola ever scores 20 goals in a Premiership season, just let me know, please. That 'won't happen, ever. But, problem with Ameobi is not solely in his ability or disability to score. Problem is that when you're playing with him in the team it looks like you have one player less on the pitch. His control of the ball is awful, and so is his ability to pass and colaborate with the other striker and midfielders. I thought we were talking about Shola here, not Martins... I thought it's pretty obvious Martins can exchange passes, even when paired with less than top of the class striker like Sibierski. But then, some people prefer hockey to football... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wondermike Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 He should go and play for whatever country his dad is from if he wants international football, balls to the england set up, there sh*te Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 He should go and play for whatever country his dad is from if he wants international football, balls to the england set up, there sh*te I'm guessing that he sees himself as being slightly above playing for the Indian national team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sniffer Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Maybe he'd be worried that after one bad result, if you let a hanful of indians into your room they might throttle you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Maybe he'd be worried that after one bad result, if you let a hanful of indians into your room they might throttle you. He's Indian not Pakistani. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Maybe he'd be worried that after one bad result, if you let a hanful of indians into your room they might throttle you. He's Indian not Pakistani. Same thing, innit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sniffer Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 But you know the song......Anything you can do, I can do better, I can do anything better than you..........sang the indian to the paki... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now