Dave Posted April 18, 2006 Share Posted April 18, 2006 No, because anyone who thought that we wouldn't lose more than £3m by keeping on an incompetent, lying coward was a complete fucking cretin. So you weren't overly keen then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest geordiebaz Posted April 18, 2006 Share Posted April 18, 2006 But the fickle elementwould turn on him after a bad run which we will get sometime, some already started doing that after 4 losses last month, 2 reasons why he shouldn't get the job 1. He cant hasn't got badges 2. he doesn't want it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted April 18, 2006 Share Posted April 18, 2006 No, because anyone who thought that we wouldn't lose more than £3m by keeping on an incompetent, lying coward was a complete ****ing cretin. So you weren't overly keen then? You picked up on that? I thought i was hiding it pretty well, as i did fron the day he joined. bluesigh.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blackamp;White Posted April 18, 2006 Share Posted April 18, 2006 Done an absolutley cracking job and deserves the chance to do it full time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted April 18, 2006 Share Posted April 18, 2006 I hope no-one who said "no" or "don't know" EVER said 'give Souness more time', because that would be too laughable even for us NUFC fans. Why? Because someone felt that the best course of action would be to stick with someone who would cost about £3m to pay off rather then sack him immediatly, they're not allowed to express an opinion on who they want next? No, because anyone who thought that we wouldn't lose more than £3m by keeping on an incompetent, lying coward was a complete fucking cretin. You missed out the "imo". I agree, anyone who was wrong in the past shouldn't be allowed to express an opinion about the future Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted April 18, 2006 Share Posted April 18, 2006 I hope no-one who said "no" or "don't know" EVER said 'give Souness more time', because that would be too laughable even for us NUFC fans. Why? Because someone felt that the best course of action would be to stick with someone who would cost about £3m to pay off rather then sack him immediatly, they're not allowed to express an opinion on who they want next? No, because anyone who thought that we wouldn't lose more than £3m by keeping on an incompetent, lying coward was a complete ****ing cretin. You missed out the "imo". I agree, anyone who was wrong in the past shouldn't be allowed to express an opinion about the future Its not IMO, its fact. Anyone who thought that Souness was a credicble manager, especially towards the end of his tenure, SHOULDN'T be able to express an opinion ab out the future, no. In the same way as you wouldn't get driving lessons of a drunken blind man with rage issues. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisJbarnes Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 haha reading this is hilarrious Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 Quite pleasing to come back to this thread and see I not only voted, but also argued for no. 8) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now