gdm

Can they start bringing out stuff in the away kit colours instead of this green nonsense. The away kit is good because they colours work

Good enough for me.

I’m talking about the Schar incident if it was other way round. If Schar had dived and Diaz got sent off think we’d all be like great they are down to 10 while saying it was never a red. When you slow it right down Diaz puts his head forward then dives back. It should have been rescinded on that alone

We’d take the team going down to 10 but no one would seriously suggest it was a red card

There will be better stuff coming I’d imagine.

anything to escape the wrath. I hear you

The summer was a shambles for Man Utd. Was clear to everyone they wanted rid of ETH. They couldn’t find anyone and extended his contract and now 6 games in it’s to expensive to sack him

Good choice

Fair enough. Didn’t realise that was a thing. Suppose I’m looking at it from the point of view that we’ve had adidas before so it’s easy to make adidas remakes but for example if Man City hadn’t had puma before they can only remake other brands

If they were to remake any non adidas shirt it should be the 94 asics one

I’ll take your word for it. Still very unlikely when they have a number of adidas shirts they could remake. Also the ‘plaid pattern’ makes it sound like it’ll be a new unique shirt

Why would adidas remake an Umbro kit

I mean can no one read it says it in the article The 2025-2026 Adidas Newcastle United FC jersey features the classic black and white stripes, but with a unique plaid pattern that sets it apart.

Was more of a red card than Schar’s. Aye he slipped but the slip didn’t make him flick his leg out high. Nonsense

I’m not arsed about referees or var I’m talking purely on what I saw. Personally I thought it was very soft, you see it a different way. That’s fine. We can disagree, the world won’t end. They won’t take the goal away. Relax

Let’s not discuss anything then

I don’t give a shit either way that’s my point it’s nothing worth arguing about. It’s subjective people can see it different ways. It’s your it’s a penalty and no one else can see it any other way attitude is silly. I’m delighted the penalty was given and I don’t believe for a second you wouldn’t be moaning had it been the other way. Jota’s for example

You replied like 4 times it was being argumentative

Honestly if that was Haaland getting that yesterday this place would be in absolute outrage. Btw Tino’s v Barca wasn’t a pen either

just because you saying it’s a penalty doesn’t mean it is. I guarantee if it was the other way around you’d be absolutely fuming…again like the Jota one. Everything you have said about this one could be said about the Jota one and I’ll bet you are adamant that wasn’t a penalty. Jota was running at speed and his foot got clipped by Pope the only difference is Jota went down in instalments

No disrespect but that’s a ridiculous comment. just because on a purely football sense I didn’t think it was a penalty doesn’t mean I didn’t enjoy us getting it and scoring it also everything you described there describes Jota v Pope and I’m certain you didn’t think that was a pen

Why are you being so argumentative about it? it’s fine to disagree. Let it go man. It’s irrelevant now. We are all glad it was given. if that was given against us the same people would be up in arms. There was minimal contact much like the Jota one. The Jota one just looked worse coz he took a step before going down.

that’s just not true. Many incidents like that aren’t given so 10/10 is completely wrong. Regardless I'm glad it was given

just honest opinion. Gordon clearly goes looking for it. The one we didn’t get was more of a pen

I don’t think it was either tbh