gdm

This is what frustrates me about the age argument both Ekitike & Ramos are scoring and assisting for fun at a similar age. Pedro struggles to score in the championship.

what Swiss ramble post? This one? Well given that post was what? 9 days ago and at least 4 journalists have been saying £40m since the beginning of July that seems unlikely.

No I’m not referring to the Swiss ramble. So I haven’t misunderstood. I’m referring to journalist after journalist telling us week after week that what’s left of our budget (after Botman) was around £40m but my point was only really that Chelsea have the resources, funds and squad to be able to spend £20m on a virtually untried prospect. Us not so much

And what if him and a loan is our remaining business ?

Need a McNair card for £360 argh

They can afford to invest £20m in a young player that’s hardly played. We (as reported) only have £40m left and need to fill 2-3 places in the squad and unlike Chelsea we don’t really have the players of quality they have

Don’t get me started on what our fans thought about Sammy Ameobi & Nile Ranger

Fuck off blackburn

Trust someone to take it seriously. Well done

He really does look real quality

This kid has scored more in the 3 champions league qualifier games that Joao Pedro scored in the full PL season last season. Fun fact

would so much rather sign him. Definitely knows where the goal is

Gayle had ball in net but disallowed. Boro equalise

Thanks

You got a link please? I’m trying to get persuaded

Sky backtracked and said it wasn’t as high as £45m regardless been round in circles about the budget. It doesn’t seem far off £40m what ever it is

This kid seems to rave about every Watford player tbf

Did we? Certain journalists (hope in particular) insists we only went as high as £40m then sky back tracked on their reported price too iirc

Ng, O’Nien & McNair to be carded 70/1

Clark is out injured

We don’t have £60m its more likely to be Pedro and Pulisic or Gallagher on loan

Thank you

Has that tweet been deleted ?