gdm

Total bollocks. We won't spend £14m on any player

Swansea chairman on talksport shortly, will touch on the offer

How how many punts and risks are people willing to take. So far our 3 signings have a large element of risk, with 2 of then with questionable injury records

Urgh Ireland

Moses?

As it says in the article. He's cheap

Probably waiting for a bigger bid for Krul from someone sadly

#nufc #lfc Been told that Liverpool are seething after missing out on Sylvain Marveaux

1. I doubt we'd pay £10.5million for Erdinc 2. I doubt Chelsea would sell Sturridge for £10million I'm only going by 2 reports from the same journalist

£10.5m for Erding yet £10m for Sturridge is too much

What does everyone usually mean? If the price is right he will be sold.

If it's true, I can't believe we are not interested in paying £10m for Sturridge. Looks like we are trying to do everything on the cheap. Wait and see I guess

just go for it

Didn't mystic mag change his name to toontastic

Totally agree with Wullie. Sturridge is just what we need and should be at least trying to get him

We are likely to get Erding as our main striker.

It was in one of national papers last week they wanted £20m

It's possible that Ba wasn't in the list of striker targets and when he became available we saw him as an upgrade to best for free while still getting £4m in for Best?

Villa paying £2m compensation

should have had a double against Arsenal. The one ruled out for offside should have stood

the newspapers would have a field day lol

not saying Ba isn't a good player but just because a deal is good dosn't mean its the right player for the club and it certainly seems we are mainly scouting players we can get a good deal on.

if Ba wasn't free would he have been a target?

pretty much gonna be Erding surely. not that interesting

Im banned, what does it say? thread titled. Newcastle hilarity thread started from whenn hughton got sacked. a post 3 pages in - Another reason why Randy Lerner is great!