Jump to content

chicago_shearer

Member
  • Posts

    6,379
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chicago_shearer

  1. Bellamy* (West Ham) - Lita (Reading) - Bale (Tottenham) - Scholes* (Man U) - Steven Davis (Fulham) - Bentley (Blackburn) - Baines (Everton) - Taylor (Newcastle) - McManus* (Celtic) - Richards (Man City) - Carson (Liverpool)

     

    Hoyte (Arsenal) - Nugent (Portsmouth) - Young (Villa) - Jerome (Birmingham) - Hutton (Rangers) - Barnes (Derby) - Cotterill (Wigan) - Smith (Chelsea) - Cattermole (Boro) - Guthrie (Bolton) - Wallace (Sunderland) - Some British goalkeeper from the Championship.

     

    That was difficult.  And I've guessed at some of their ages. 

  2. What do you mean by not a "settled" team?  Without much argument, England's potential squad for the finals (if they even make it) would be:

     

    James, Robinson, Carson

    A. Cole, Shorey, Terry, Ferdinand, Lescott, Richards, G. Neville

    Gerrard, Barry, Lampard, Wright-Phillips, J. Cole, Lennon, Beckham, Hargreaves, Carrick

    Owen, Heskey, Rooney, Crouch

     

    With the odd exception, maybe Bridge or Bentley for Shorey & Beckham, that would have to be it.  You say the team isn't settled, but your only point is that you want Rooney in for Heskey. 

  3. The last two matches have been England's best in years.  Anyone who wants to tinker with it for the sake of including players with massive reputations is just mental.

     

    This latest formula looks like a winner - Owen OR Rooney (not together) paired with Heskey OR Crouch.  On current form, Heskey & Owen.  No question.  We've seen no evidence that Owen & Rooney are an effective partnership.  Little & large is what they know how to do, so why mess with it?

     

    Lampard should be in the squad as cover for Gerrard.  Not first choice.  Barry, Hargreaves & Carrick for the other midfield role.  In that order.

     

    It just seems like common sense at this point.  England finally play well, and everyone wants to change things.

     

    and keiran richardson at left wing, as he played so well against the USA and columbia.

     

    point being, two games against s*** opposition hasn't solved england's problems or formed a settled team.

     

    Bingo :thup:.

     

    Woopdeedoo England played well against the likes of Israel and Russia (at home may i add), dosent mean much tbh. Heskey played well again but do you really trust him to perform like this against the bigger nations? i certainly dont. One thing i would be delighted about though is not having to see fat boy Frank on the pitch on a regular basis.

     

    So what is it you want to change exactly?  Dropping Barry, who has played well?  Or is it just Heskey that bothers you? 

     

    The fact of the matter is that England will always be playing those long balls forward.  Heskey is good at bringing them down.  Rooney isn't.  He's a good player, but he should be rotated into the side with Owen.  Not partnered with him.  When have you seen it work?

  4. The last two matches have been England's best in years.  Anyone who wants to tinker with it for the sake of including players with massive reputations is just mental.

     

    This latest formula looks like a winner - Owen OR Rooney (not together) paired with Heskey OR Crouch.  On current form, Heskey & Owen.  No question.  We've seen no evidence that Owen & Rooney are an effective partnership.  Little & large is what they know how to do, so why mess with it?

     

    Lampard should be in the squad as cover for Gerrard.  Not first choice.  Barry, Hargreaves & Carrick for the other midfield role.  In that order.

     

    It just seems like common sense at this point.  England finally play well, and everyone wants to change things.

×
×
  • Create New...