This 50 million that keeps popping up, would somebody care to explain where it comes from based on incoming and outgoing transfer fees? As far as I can see we had sold Woodgate before Souness came in, and we sold Jenas during that period, which makes the actual figure invested closer to 30 million over the space of 3 transfer windows, which I imagine is not too disimilar to other top 6 teams at that time. We had to invest to keep up with the competition. We invested badly, unfortunately, but I don't understand why the investment itself is deserving of criticism.. How else do people expect to get (back) in the top half of the table?