Ronaldo

Was a performance to be remembered too. Indeed, I remember how s*** he was And somehow manage to forget how shit Ranger was in the first half against Leicester, or away at Peterbrough, or in a fair few of his sub apperances.

..he refused to play Rubbish, he played for the reserves. Have you all been dropped on your heads or what?

He did, he played against Reading and Sheff Wed then got loaned out.

..he refused to play Rubbish, he played for the reserves. cant you read? http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Newcastle-flop-Xisco-deliberately-stopped-playing-to-force-move-away-from-club-article146485.html FOR AN ENTIRE SEASON Does that not suggest to you that I was referring to last season.

You're going to argue for one second that Ranger has earned his status as a player 'who should start alongside Carroll'?

..he refused to play Rubbish, he played for the reserves.

such s****. just give up man. Once again, you can't explain why.

Horrific attitude? For an entire season he wasn't even acknowledged by his manager. His attiutde last season was spot on, even if he looked a poor player.

Yes, and he did. The same amount that Ranger does. One's lazy and the other's a workhorse, ask yourself why?

Scott Parker? WTF are you on about now... all you had to do was see Xisco play and see Ranger play to see that Nile puts in much more effort than Xisco ever did. Parker was not and never was a lazy player. I don't think you've quite grasped the concept of a striker putting in effort. ie Intelligent, disciplined running. Too funny, Xisco did non of that anyway .. are you ever going to make an intelligent post?? I never said he did.

Be honest, if his name wasn't Nile Ranger and he wasn't 18 you'd not appreciate those contributions.

Wait for it.

Scott Parker? WTF are you on about now... all you had to do was see Xisco play and see Ranger play to see that Nile puts in much more effort than Xisco ever did. Parker was not and never was a lazy player. I don't think you've quite grasped the concept of a striker putting in effort. ie Intelligent, disciplined running.

Where does it say he refused to train?

Scott Parker?

Xisco does not put in anywhere near the same shift as ranger. Back that up somehow.

Refused to train? More made up nonsense. All the Deportivo fans said the same about him, grafter, runs his bollocks off for the team. But he comes here and becomes lazy because he's an expensive striker who didn't look like scoring. I see Ranger's promise, I also see a player who never looks like scoring despite being a striker.

What makes Xisco lazy and Ranger anything but? Both run around lots, exert more or less the same amount of effort, but one's a young english lad who's come from the reserves and didn't cost a penny.

I don't and never implied so.

Not that you can begin to explain why.

Had Xisco put in the exact performances that Ranger had, you'd all have the knifes out. 19 games without a goal, lazy spanish t*** etc etc etc.

No, I wouldn't.. f*** off You think Ranger and Carroll are the best strikers at the club you complete numpty.

f***s sake if thats the case we have to applaud whoever put the ball in for ranger to challenge, and whoever got the ball to him and colo for getting the ball wide etc etc etc. when in fact what you are saying is that in the run up to the goal he played a part, not even a touch, therefore the goal was down to him. favouritism at it's most pathetic blindness. Exactly man, same with Krul after WBA. Bias is beyond belief.

You'd be calling for him to stay in the reserves had it not been for Nolan.