NG32

Weve not won anything since 1969, so whats the differnece? We may as well make a play for trying to become an established "top 6" side rather than resting our current status.

I cant imagine why any one would vote for the status quo, other than the so called and self appointed "top 6". Its literally accepting you will never challenge them and if you did manage to build a decent side, within a season or two your best playing assets will be stripped from your club.

Thats what i was thinkig this morning, City must be confident that they will win this case against the Premier League rules.

I dont want to blow other clubs out the water, i just want to be able to compete with the top 6 but that unfortunately requires investment and spending in large amounts for the short term. Long term we can keeping investing in youth players, development 7 training facilities.

I dont think his brand would allow him back in the Premier League.

Yeap, defo gone.

Ants in his pants Ashworth

No, its a bit of a soul crusher at the moment.

Grainger Market Tyson Fury.

They will be coming for Howe now.

A wider global audience who have been fed the so called top clubs on footy games, twitter and merchandise. These corporate banks have probably looked at it and thought they can create a European football style, NFL franchise model to sell to this wider audience. However it will be soulless and empty of emotion. I suppose the money might be coming in but after that?

Who has hired him, is it City or are we part of a working group attempting to dismantle the current financial "status quo"?

Not sure if id pay to see you in a leotard sat on a chair having buckets of water thrown on you.

Thats one hell of a line.

Why would villa vote against a fixed transfer limit set equally for all teams? It would be the best option for all involved as there is no way the league and the so called self appointed "top 6" will cave on un controlled spending.