cp40

fuck off you vile vermin.

Well that was interesting. Any conclusions?

the dogs bollocks

legends should be a canny listen tonight.

So are you saying that a £25 million compensation claim in these circumstances was justified? I am. Tell me why it wasn't. It wasn't justified otherwise he would have got it. He seems happy enough with what he's got and good for him. Just because his lawyers were going for whatever they could doesn't make it right. No, he didn't get it because it was written into his contract that he couldn't get it. The verdict had nothing to do with whether the 25m was justified or not, and since KK accepted that publishing the verdict would restore his reputation, the 25m wasn't an issue anymore. Exactly. I think some people on here need to fucking read the thing before mouthing off about what Keegan 'was awarded'. they need to read the tribunal , and keegans statement.

what an oblivious mentalist

Ashley door M4tt^^^^

How the f*** is he a 'thieving c***' for claiming any amount in a case which he went on to win? Stick to NFL, you plum. Agreed compensation of 2m, he got what he deserved, but he tried to get more. How does that make him a thief? Haha, okay, attempted thief. What was he trying to steal? Did he not give justification for his claim? Did he not then accept that this justification was flawed? I don't care what he has said after the decision had been made, it's completely irrelevant. When in court (or whatever it's called!) he tried to get £25m and he failed as it was completely unjustifiable. So, again, how does that make him a thief? Were the fans that attempted to sue the club over the seats affair 'thieving c***s'? Was Bobby Robson a 'thieving c***'? 1) already explained 2) have no clue about said cases Sending me PMs is pretty pathetic like. You haven't explained a thing. Avoiding questions is more so, I'd say. You're f***ing plastic, pal. He tried to get £25m and he failed as it was completely unjustifiable. Your random insults are pretty needless. Actually, this was more specifically meant for people such as yourself: No, 99% of the forum shouldn't blindly infer they know the technicalities revolving around legal disputes relating to termination of contracts that went on behind closed doors (EDIT: I'm not saying 99% of the forum are doing this by the way, just repeating the figure you used). Opinions are fine, but if they are coming from blind assumptions about something people don't understand they are rightly going to get shot down. I read law, i've got f*** all idea about what happened here but i'd hazard a guess Keegan handed the facts over to his legal team and went 'sort this out for me please' and they took it from there. Because Keegan isn't a solicitor, he's a pretty basic football man. Building a 25m straw man to beat down is pretty pointless when i'd happily bet a fair amount of money keegan had nothing to do with that figure. Do you think he went to his solicitors and went "right boys, i'd like one of those stigma pay offs for 8.6m, all my wages and anything else you reckon i can get"? Or do you think he went with what they told him because they are trained to deal with this and he wouldn't have a clue what to do in a court hearing? Hmmm... Neither of us know the ins and outs of why they really decided those figures, but Keegan was obviously aware of what they were asking for and could have told them not to go so far. But neither of us can really conclusively answer this can we? It's just a matter of opinion. I think he could've told them he didn't want to claim for so much, as he had some personal investiment in the club. He didn't do that. But there will be reasons for these figures, he'd have known he wouldn't get them, they would have been used for the purposes of the case. He couldn't go in and say he just wanted the 2m as they'd have settled straight away and Keegan wouldn't have been able to have the facts independently published as they have been. The ludicrous amount of 25m assured it went to tribunal, at which point it would appear from the quotes in the other thread keegan immediately accepted he wouldn't get the stigma damages as long as all findings were published, which is what he has said he wanted to happen, to clear his name. I think I trust Keegan enough to believe this rather than that he was trying to take the club to the cleaners. Well thats the crux of the matter really. I don't trust him enough to believe that. So you genuinely believe he wanted to take us for as much money as he could? Do you really think he then set out to f*** it over deliberately just to spite Mike Ashley? Keegan has a lot of flaws i'm happy to admit that, but to think he is a liar out to milk the club dry is just crazy. I don't think his reasoning was to kill the club (and don't think £25m would achieve that... at least I hope not!), I think he just wanted to get as much money as he could possibly manage, even if it greatly harmed NUFC. Rather than claiming for what he deserved. Worng, you really are a moron. Just admit that you were wrong. the GIMP has spoken.

ashley bummers are so desperate, they cling to an argument about how much compen was sought. some people just dont know when they are dead and buried, and turning to dust.

http://i674.photobucket.com/albums/vv108/centerpaddock82/youtubesigning.jpg

How the fuck is he a 'thieving cunt' for claiming any amount in a case which he went on to win? Stick to NFL, you plum. Agreed compensation of 2m, he got what he deserved, but he tried to get more. How does that make him a thief? Haha, okay, attempted thief. What was he trying to steal? Did he not give justification for his claim? Did he not then accept that this justification was flawed? I don't care what he has said after the decision had been made, it's completely irrelevant. When in court (or whatever it's called!) he tried to get £25m and he failed as it was completely unjustifiable. well thats better than calling him a thief.

How the fuck is he a 'thieving cunt' for claiming any amount in a case which he went on to win? Stick to NFL, you plum. Agreed compensation of 2m, he got what he deserved, but he tried to get more. How does that make him a thief? if keegan was a thief, he wouldnt have objected to signing players off you tube,.... no honour among thieves,.. conclusion, keegan is not a thief and his reputation is still intact.

knacker

Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. oh hes found an escape route for the Ashley bummers ;D

Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. theres a word for these people,. knackers.

whres that bloke that does the spurs flash animation?

could they have done worse that arsley. is there any competent people working in Football?

IF true,.... quite an event on the day, Keegans integrity has been upheld.

If you are unfairly sacked from a job - which essentially is what happened to Keegan - would you not want compensation? Not compensation to cover me until my 65th birthday I wouldn't... Even if your employer slagged you off meaning no one else in the profession would be likely to want to employ you? Because that's the basis here. Not taking sides as such btw (too lazy for that), just asking. you lot need to read keegans statement,

Would you rather keep Hughton and be relegated again after the last performance? Ok i will explain this pretty obvious facepalm to you. 1. How in the hell do you ever expect Keegan to return now while Ashley owns the club? Even my goldfish has the common sense to see this is never going to happen. Only a total moron would think Keegan would throw away his dignity by working for him after this. 2. When did he turn down £28m for the fans? club sold,.... keegan can come back ,cos he didnt rip the club off as his haters had said, and he has been proven right

Liking it Spence.......must be the fuckers on y redeeming feature though Afternoon Addy Is this the same Addy i was at the Match with on weds.? Whey Aye Chicken Pie! are the germans, chileans, hungarians, and Smogs you were with hear anarl?

YES

WILL ARsley be at the Match tomorrow?

Liking it Spence.......must be the fuckers on y redeeming feature though Afternoon Addy Is this the same Addy i was at the Match with on weds.?