ChrisMcQuillan
-
Posts
3,987 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by ChrisMcQuillan
-
-
Cannot BELIEVE our backline at the end was
Raylor Kadar Tozer Enrique
-
Oh, look, Ronaldo.
Carroll/Ranger/Nolan, and two score in 45 minutes.
Imagine that. Someone here suggested this...
-
Absolutely love that Donaldson's is more expensive than Harewood.
-
We should have a Kevin Nolan thread for this and send it to Chris Hughton. It's getting ridiculous!
-
He's a striker who's never looked any genuine goal threat
Did you even read my original post?
Carroll and Ranger may not be the most prolific scorers of all time, but when they play together and Nolan plays behind them we perform better. Who cares if Carroll or Ranger score, if by playing together they create the space and opportunity to lay it to Nolan?
This is exactly the point I was trying to make at the start: making Carroll a scapegoat. And when he's benched next week, and Harewood and Lovenkrands look s*** by playing in an all-new, ill-practiced formation, we'll all be after Harewood and Lovenkrands as being s***. And then Ranger and Nolan the next week. And then we'll all want Carroll back, cause we've blamed everyone else since.
These players are not all s***. They need a system to play to their strengths, and it's Hughton's job to recognise that.
With the excpetion of the Ipswich game we've looked horrific with Carroll and Ranger up font. And even in the game most agreed that Carroll was poor.
Wasn't it earlier someone said Nolan had scored 5 of his 7 goals this season behind Carroll and Ranger.
They facilitate the team form that seems to work best.
I would take issue with us looking "horrific" with Carroll and Ranger up front, and tbh, Carroll's looked better to me all season than his alternatives. So I don't see who'd replace him, which I wouldn't do anyway given that I think we need to stick to those tactics.
I said that Nolan had scored 5 out of 6 with 2 or more strikers on the pitch. I don't see how that relates to Andy Carroll (a striker) getting away with scoring no goals.
Because personally, right now, I don't care who's scoring. I think we play our best football in the 4-4-2-Diamond formation, with Nolan behind the two players I think have the best hold-up play when playing together: Carroll and Ranger.
As I cited earlier, Heskey's a striker. Capello's not picking him for goal-scoring prowess, certainly. He's picking him for what he sets up for Rooney. And if we need both Ranger and Carroll to set-up Nolan or Guthrie or one another, I don't care how many they score so long as we win.
-
I'd question why Vukic isn't getting a look in, given that he seems to have something that nobody else in the squad does.
Glad to see we're agreeing on something tonight.
-
According to .com and .cock Smith is going to miss the doncaster game.
So the 7 day rule doesn't apply for the Championship? Can't say I mind, never saw the reason behind it.
I'm pretty sure that card was his 6th, and that the 5th ban had already been applied after the weekend. It does take into account the 7-day rule or whatever, hence he was going to be missing Doncaster anyway.
-
He's a striker who's never looked any genuine goal threat
Did you even read my original post?
Carroll and Ranger may not be the most prolific scorers of all time, but when they play together and Nolan plays behind them we perform better. Who cares if Carroll or Ranger score, if by playing together they create the space and opportunity to lay it to Nolan?
This is exactly the point I was trying to make at the start: making Carroll a scapegoat. And when he's benched next week, and Harewood and Lovenkrands look s*** by playing in an all-new, ill-practiced formation, we'll all be after Harewood and Lovenkrands as being s***. And then Ranger and Nolan the next week. And then we'll all want Carroll back, cause we've blamed everyone else since.
These players are not all s***. They need a system to play to their strengths, and it's Hughton's job to recognise that.
With the excpetion of the Ipswich game we've looked horrific with Carroll and Ranger up font. And even in the game most agreed that Carroll was poor.
Wasn't it earlier someone said Nolan had scored 5 of his 7 goals this season behind Carroll and Ranger.
They facilitate the team form that seems to work best.
I would take issue with us looking "horrific" with Carroll and Ranger up front, and tbh, Carroll's looked better to me all season than his alternatives. So I don't see who'd replace him, which I wouldn't do anyway given that I think we need to stick to those tactics.
-
He's a striker who's never looked any genuine goal threat
Did you even read my original post?
Carroll and Ranger may not be the most prolific scorers of all time, but when they play together and Nolan plays behind them we perform better. Who cares if Carroll or Ranger score, if by playing together they create the space and opportunity to lay it to Nolan?
This is exactly the point I was trying to make at the start: making Carroll a scapegoat. And when he's benched next week, and Harewood and Lovenkrands look shit by playing in an all-new, ill-practiced formation, we'll all be after Harewood and Lovenkrands as being shit. And then Ranger and Nolan the next week. And then we'll all want Carroll back, cause we've blamed everyone else since.
These players are not all shit. They need a system to play to their strengths, and it's Hughton's job to recognise that.
-
I suppose I should make a case for my Carroll inclusion.
I think that of late we have made a habit of finding scapegoats for the teams problems. It'll be Jonas one week: he just doesn't cut it. Nolan the next: he's woeful. Or Ranger: he hasn't scored yet.
But in football, as I think the likes of Keegan and Robson realised, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. I guarantee you the likes of Jonny Evans, Geovanni dos Santos or any other bright young talent would never look as good in our team. Lack of confidence, lack of performance. See Mr. Bramble for an example. Hell, Oguchi Onyewu was signed for Milan after us.
The point is, for the team to function, it has to flow and perform right. We've been at our most dangerous with Carroll and Ranger up front, with Nolan playing off them. It's like the Owen/Martins/Viduka triumvirate: often appearing poor when playing apart, suddenly playing well with each other.
I think we have to experiment more with the Carroll/Ranger/Nolan thing. I don't give a s*** if Ranger scores or not, if we can facilitate a team line-up that wins matches. See Ipswich Town (A). Capello picks Heskey for the England team for exactly the same reason.
I fear it's an indication of Hughton's inexperience that he chops and changes the way our team lines up up front. Consistency comes in stability - the Simpson/Taylor/Colo/Enrique back pairing for instance. When we played Carroll and Ranger consistently, goals came from the midfield and up front. Now Harewood's introduction (I do think he's a good player, by the way) has messed up the team's shape and flow. Harewood may well be a good player for us yet, but Hughton has to find in training the team format that facilitates him and our victory. What we're playing at the minute is what Hughton thinks will work, because it works with other players. But Harewood is not as good at Ranger at holding up the ball, simple as. And he's not as good a foil for Carroll. That said, if we had to play a lone striker, I'd fancy Harewood to fashion something out of nothing more than anyone else at the club.
It's all about a mix, and for the time being, Carroll's in the mix I feel will work.
Hope some of you read that and haven't felt it a waste of time. I really should be reading about epidemic mortality rates between different religious groups in the late Roman Empire. Thought I'd take a break.
Bramble and Carroll isn't a great comparison as Titus' talent was pretty evident from the start. Carroll isn't really demonstrating genuine ability to me.
I wasn't trying to directly compare Bramble and Carroll.
Bramble is an example of how a player can crack under the pressure of a system which doesn't play to their strengths.
To say Carroll doesn't have any ability is symptomatic of what's wrong here. Carroll was one of the NE's brightest young talents, and Bufffon tipped him for a good future in the game. He CAN score, as he has shown over the last two seasons. But his talent is being stifled by the system we have at the moment, which doesn't work and fractures confidence.
Carroll has scored 5 goals for nufc mate
saying he CAN score is based on f*** all
:idiot2:Carroll has scored. So therefore, saying he can score is obviously deluded.
What?
-
I suppose I should make a case for my Carroll inclusion.
I think that of late we have made a habit of finding scapegoats for the teams problems. It'll be Jonas one week: he just doesn't cut it. Nolan the next: he's woeful. Or Ranger: he hasn't scored yet.
But in football, as I think the likes of Keegan and Robson realised, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. I guarantee you the likes of Jonny Evans, Geovanni dos Santos or any other bright young talent would never look as good in our team. Lack of confidence, lack of performance. See Mr. Bramble for an example. Hell, Oguchi Onyewu was signed for Milan after us.
The point is, for the team to function, it has to flow and perform right. We've been at our most dangerous with Carroll and Ranger up front, with Nolan playing off them. It's like the Owen/Martins/Viduka triumvirate: often appearing poor when playing apart, suddenly playing well with each other.
I think we have to experiment more with the Carroll/Ranger/Nolan thing. I don't give a s*** if Ranger scores or not, if we can facilitate a team line-up that wins matches. See Ipswich Town (A). Capello picks Heskey for the England team for exactly the same reason.
I fear it's an indication of Hughton's inexperience that he chops and changes the way our team lines up up front. Consistency comes in stability - the Simpson/Taylor/Colo/Enrique back pairing for instance. When we played Carroll and Ranger consistently, goals came from the midfield and up front. Now Harewood's introduction (I do think he's a good player, by the way) has messed up the team's shape and flow. Harewood may well be a good player for us yet, but Hughton has to find in training the team format that facilitates him and our victory. What we're playing at the minute is what Hughton thinks will work, because it works with other players. But Harewood is not as good at Ranger at holding up the ball, simple as. And he's not as good a foil for Carroll. That said, if we had to play a lone striker, I'd fancy Harewood to fashion something out of nothing more than anyone else at the club.
It's all about a mix, and for the time being, Carroll's in the mix I feel will work.
Hope some of you read that and haven't felt it a waste of time. I really should be reading about epidemic mortality rates between different religious groups in the late Roman Empire. Thought I'd take a break.
Bramble and Carroll isn't a great comparison as Titus' talent was pretty evident from the start. Carroll isn't really demonstrating genuine ability to me.
I wasn't trying to directly compare Bramble and Carroll.
Bramble is an example of how a player can crack under the pressure of a system which doesn't play to their strengths.
To say Carroll doesn't have any ability is symptomatic of what's wrong here. Carroll was one of the NE's brightest young talents, and Bufffon tipped him for a good future in the game. He CAN score, as he has shown over the last two seasons. But his talent is being stifled by the system we have at the moment, which doesn't work and fractures confidence.
-
Middlesbrough sack Southgate after a win.
Newcastle offer Hughton the mangerial position after a defeat.
Clueless chairmen, my friends. That's why we're in the Championship and sucking immensely.
-
I suppose I should make a case for my Carroll inclusion.
I think that of late we have made a habit of finding scapegoats for the teams problems. It'll be Jonas one week: he just doesn't cut it. Nolan the next: he's woeful. Or Ranger: he hasn't scored yet.
But in football, as I think the likes of Keegan and Robson realised, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. I guarantee you the likes of Jonny Evans, Geovanni dos Santos or any other bright young talent would never look as good in our team. Lack of confidence, lack of performance. See Mr. Bramble for an example. Hell, Oguchi Onyewu was signed for Milan after us.
The point is, for the team to function, it has to flow and perform right. We've been at our most dangerous with Carroll and Ranger up front, with Nolan playing off them. It's like the Owen/Martins/Viduka triumvirate: often appearing poor when playing apart, suddenly playing well with each other.
I think we have to experiment more with the Carroll/Ranger/Nolan thing. I don't give a shit if Ranger scores or not, if we can facilitate a team line-up that wins matches. See Ipswich Town (A). Capello picks Heskey for the England team for exactly the same reason.
I fear it's an indication of Hughton's inexperience that he chops and changes the way our team lines up up front. Consistency comes in stability - the Simpson/Taylor/Colo/Enrique back pairing for instance. When we played Carroll and Ranger consistently, goals came from the midfield and up front. Now Harewood's introduction (I do think he's a good player, by the way) has messed up the team's shape and flow. Harewood may well be a good player for us yet, but Hughton has to find in training the team format that facilitates him and our victory. What we're playing at the minute is what Hughton thinks will work, because it works with other players. But Harewood is not as good at Ranger at holding up the ball, simple as. And he's not as good a foil for Carroll. That said, if we had to play a lone striker, I'd fancy Harewood to fashion something out of nothing more than anyone else at the club.
It's all about a mix, and for the time being, Carroll's in the mix I feel will work.
Hope some of you read that and haven't felt it a waste of time. I really should be reading about epidemic mortality rates between different religious groups in the late Roman Empire. Thought I'd take a break.
-
Harper
Simpson Coloccini Khizanishvili Enrique
Guthrie
R Taylor Jonas
Nolan
Carroll Ranger
Subs: Krul, Kadar, Geremi, Butt, Lovenkrands, Harewood, Vuckic
-
Hughton got the lineup badly wrong again but just look at that central defence man, it's a complete joke
Who should he have played instead?
I personally would attempt to play a centre back at centre back.
-
I don't care anymore.
i just realy dont care,
-
Newcastle United. Six years ago, we were playing Barcelona. Now we can't beat Scunthorpe.
We really are Leeds 2.0.
-
The only good that can come of this is the hope that MA might realise he needs to do one ASAP
Yeah, right.
-
How do we get Ashley out?
We need to save our club.
-
If we draw, do we go top?
As things stand, yes.
-
NUFC: Steve Harper, Ryan Taylor, Zurab Khizanishvili, Danny Simpson, Jose Enrique, Danny Guthrie, Alan Smith ©, Kevin Nolan, Jonas Gutierrez, Geremi, Andy Carroll
Subs: Tim Krul, Tamas Kadar, Marlon Harewood, Nile Ranger, Peter Lovenkrands, Ryan Donaldson, Ben Tozer
-
From BBC Live Text
2042: I'm being urged in some quarters to talk about the game I attended on Saturday - Nottingham Forest's magnificent 1-0 victory over Newcastle United in front of a full house and a cracking atmosphere at the City Ground, the most fun I've had at a Reds game for what seems like years and years. But I'm not going to, because it's not relevant.
Talk about rubbing salt in the wound.
-
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ScsYwvhlaac/SmXcllbxC2I/AAAAAAAAAGY/uckFIWFQKcM/s400/%234ObamaFacepalm.png
-
So we've what, hit the woodwork 5 times, and had two goals disallowed since the last time we scored?
Chris Hughton
in Football
Posted
HUghton.