High Five o

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-1213480/CHARLES-SALE-Fraud-probe-force-Ashley-sale.html#ixzz0R7sltFsq Why the hell would a children's charity buy a football club? Good question. I suppose it's as likely as anything else though. But i cant see how they are allowed to do it, isn't (charity) foundations supposed to me non profit organizations? (Correct me if i`m dead wrong) Its utter bullshait imo If the world freezes over, and they somehow pushes trough, it will be to sell in the summer to cash in some money, without investing a great deal.... Do we want it, i think not.

Mr Jamie Underwood i sincerely hope you burn in hell for all eternity.... Sad twat.

Last 10 pages about Keegan, isn't it a own thread dedicated to him? I just go fucking bananas when i see new post here, and its not even relevant... Please keep to ITK bullshit and random newspaper articles here, thanks

Haha, i love the sign with N.A.M.B.L.A! Southpark

Yeah but.... Story in the press = Random wild guess at what is going on Word man! SS is a ITK, but at the wrong place The press ITK.

This is pure quality!

Sums it up preeety good

Who you calling fool, fool! Hehe

Was written in affection fool. Was colo who fucked it up, but hey, Smith was bound for the red card anyway. He is El Loco!

Ay, but showed that we can get away with almost anything in this league....

Great! 3 very important points. Not a good performance overall, but a excellent job defending... Good work lads.

Dear Smith. Fuck off. Regards.

We are lucky if we get away with a win...

Vuckic not in the squad?

Strange to see us in yellow.... Colo, im happy for you! :colo: Howay the lads!

You work at Trinity Mirror dont you! got ya! Yes/No?

Isent there a keegan thread you can take this?

He will get back to you 24h before the cron print the next takeover article. If he could be straight, just say he gets the info from the newspaper, no problemo. But saying he works at a law-firm, just doesn't make sense... No hard feelings Sillius, just what i think OK - predictions Not the Chron CS in the DM Ok, so your get your info from Charles Sale then, eh? It just that several times you have come with info, it been just before the papers, and just what the article say, coincident, maybe? or... Just keep the info coming, but its sad its not some genuine news we wont read in the papers the next 24h.

He will get back to you 24h before the cron print the next takeover article. If he could be straight, just say he gets the info from the newspaper, no problemo. But saying he works at a law-firm, just doesn't make sense... No hard feelings Sillius, just what i think

You know you have done something right, when you get one of those!

This just confirm what i think, Sillius Soddus comes with info like 12 hours before the papers. Have he ever given us some info that not have been in the papers the next day`? I think not. He works at a paper, end of....

The problem is that you come up with info that are about to come in the newspapers. So that why we are sceptical, how do we know that your not just a person reading through the edits or something... Or are you like that guy on TV, who gets tomorrows newspapers today?

Probably not, just good old Sillius Soddus winding up people again. But it doesent matter, as long as, stupid as it sounds, gives me alittle spark of light in the end of the tunnel.

...and here we go again Is it a lie, is it real, stay tuned

And there it is. It really is f***ing easy to make this club a success as all one needs is common footballing sense. Ashley and his cronies have clearly lacked this and here we are, slowly clawing back to normalcy despite the fat one's ineptitude. I wish. If it was as easy as you make out how come the people who have done the best job of trying in over half a bloody century are despised by so many and thought of as s***, unless the "so many" who think this way are total know-nowts? You tell me, mate. tell me who they are. the vast majority think they done very well for a while then lost it in their last few years in charge. Unfortunately in some peoples world view opinions are immutable and indivisible by time period. Thinking a film started well means you have to stand by the whole film being good, even if it ended weakly. Conversely, expressing the opinion that it ended weakly means you think it was all s****. There is no way for them to reconcile having two opinions about the same thing at different time periods. Such a pretentious comment. Was that a team effort with your class-mates? A very valid point made by Thomas tbh. That's it! I'm telling my mummy about you It would be if there was any truth behind it. What if i tell you that it is? Does that make any difference? no? This argument have been up countless of times, you guys will never agree... I think the old board was mint, until Shep took full control at the end, he lost the plot. And strugle to get the ends to meet. I could with all honesty not see how he could get us out of it. Shoot me. You can tell me that if you like, but you'll be wrong. Do you seriously believe Fred was being slaughtered on this forum only toward the end? No, im sure some people here did that from the beginning. But it was at the end of he`s reign that the majority starting to questioning him. I just cant see that they did anything wrong, it clearly did not go the right way. That is just the peoples opinion, and you and everyone else, can disagree with it, but to just calling it off, like its no truth, and everyone is wrong is just plain wrong. IMO