Jayson

If Ameobi had played that entire game and itd still ended 0-0 id think its a decent move. But hes been far to consistant to believe that we need Harewood now or we wont score. If we only brought him in to use as sub id go for it, but thats not what would happen.

Didn't you say last night that if Harewood came back we'd have four of the best strikers in the league? We could've done with a Harewood vintage tonight like, maybe the Notts Forest or Doncaster perormances. Harewood has more goals than your pal Carroll despite having half the time on the pitch. If Ranger, Ryan Taylor and Steven Taylor had finished their easy chances today would anyone have even brought up Harewood? No... No comment needed but lots of :mackems: :mackems: I'd like a comment to be honest because I haven't got a clue what you're going on about. It's not like Harewood scored in every game he played. When we were winning without Harewood scoring were you asking for another goalscorer? Because Harewood was looking like a goalscorer which is what we needed tonight but your apparent argument is that if we had scored these "easy" chances we wouldn't even be talking about Harewood. Do you not realise why I am laughing at your comment? f*** sake! I don't think he would've made a difference tonight because the reason we looked decent in the first half was because of the movement and options created by the space made up front - Harewood starting tonight would've been Sheff Weds all over again. Yes he may be more likely to finish a chance when one appears but his lack of movement could mean far fewer chances being created for the team. More generally, I'm unsure as to whether or not I'd re-sign him due to the four forwards all being fit now, and expect Ashleys preference would be not too due to the additional demand on the wage bill. I'd be more inclined to push for a Wilshere on loan than get Harewood back - as the need for some creation is greater than the need for a fifth forward imho. This is the thing isnt it, we look garbage when Harewood plays. Then he pops up in the 50th minute and puts in a tap in because hes in the right place. So we end up winning crap games. We'd play better with him not in the side, but we have to have people who will be in the right place still. I think Ameobi given a full game has shown he can & i think Lovenkrands improves our football as a team a lot just from being on the pitch. Gives us more options, we just have to put them in. Carroll should only be getting on as a sub from now on until he's shown he can find the net more often. All the build up play is great but hes not a midfielder.

Are we really going to keep Harewood on the belief that the likes of Lovenkrands/Ameobi wont score in this league given chances?

Cos we play the ball more at home, away its just punted constantly. Had a good game, just needed some strikers who were more on the ball tonight to deliver to

West brom, leicester & Cardiff coming up in our next 5 games. So those will be the ones we either push away with or get caught. I reckon we'll turn up for the bigger games, hope so anyway.

Ronaldo just looking for a reason to bum Colo endlessly over anyone else as usual

Jonas should have been motm easily

From your point of view i can imagine why someone understanding their own thoughts might be an impressive feat yes

Uh...uh....mmmm ok. Fine. So you disagree. Why ? Because when a side misses a lot of sitters, that generally doesnt mean the team they were against put in a performance deserving of them not scoring. Seeing as......they gave them loads of chances to score. I dunno, its just basic logic a child could comprehend

You've just watched a game where we've had about 4 or 5 clear chances to score. You've then chosen to pick up on the one an 18 year old has hit against the underside of the bar and had bounce on the line in the last few mins of the game, having been on for 10 minutes. He is regularly getting on the pitch now, for the last quarter hour of matches at best & you're having a go that he doesnt produce. Having just seen a game, with about 50 more talking points than Nile Rangers effort being anywhere close to bad. What more do i need to explain to you? You're looking for reasons to have a go at the lad & its a rather pointless effort. Mainly because its coming from your brain.

If Carroll would actually score hed be a very very good centre foward. Thats becoming a bigger if as time passes now unfortunately.

What is wrong with your brain Nothing whatsoever wrong with mine, but your faith in Nile Ranger shows just what yours is like. Incapable of commenting in defence of young Nile ? No bloody wonder. Barn doors and three paces spring to mind, don't they ? What springs to mind is moron tbh He did fine with the chance, it was a great save. The problem though regardless is that near the entire side missed chances throughout the entire game & you've chosen to comment on an 18 year olds 1 touch of the ball in the last 5 minutes. Then you try to form an argument about bias towards a player. It couldnt be more laughable.

What is wrong with your brain Nothing whatsoever wrong with mine, but your faith in Nile Ranger shows just what yours is like.

Nolan and Ameobi are incredibly similar in terms of being really shit and scoring goals. The goals is what makes them better than most in this league, the being shit is why we were relegated. Doesnt look brilliant for going up.

What is wrong with your brain

Because he can head a ball? yes

buy addison in the window

0-0 draw all over clearly joke of a game

this is it COME ON FFS

garbage man

2 mins at best

give it a rest ffs Of course, I missed the dozen goals he scored that only YOU have seen you're beyond help

red card GET IN THE BOX

Ameobi wtf.

get everyonnnnnnnne fowards & bollock it up the pitch