54

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-59754899

I personally would say he is, he's commanding of his box, he continually organizes and communicates the defense (This weekend aside, that was horrendous ), his distribution is decent, while not spectacular, and his shot-stopping is absolutely class. I'm not saying he shouldnt be replaced in the next 2/3 windows by the way, as I think with his age and namely his injury record he will need to be, and naturally there are better keepers out there, but for the next window he is the least of our concerns, he's a solid mid-table/lower top half keeper, a bit like Fabianski.

Are people shitting on Dubs all of a sudden? Thats news. Personally think he's a great keeper, bit off form since he came back from injury admittedly, but he's gained us much more points then he's cost us, and would personally rank him as our second best keeper of the Premier League era.

Keeper is by a country mile the least if our problems like

Other then the fact he's stated that Schar is exactly what he looks for in a CB?

Potentially going from: Murphy - Lascelles - Clark - Ritchie to: Trippier - Botman - Schar - Digne

Referee for this: Craig Pawson. The guy on VAR who didn't give the stonewall penalty against City

My brother suggested that the other day when Lewis got injured, you know he'll graft, and be a nuisance at the very least. Says something about Ritchie

There are far more people that are worthy of being peddled then Almiron. Even if he's a bit rabbit in headlights.

You do realize bringing one player in thats a bit of a dud doesn't mean he should be discarded and is awful at his job right? Like if thats the metric people are judged on there wouldnt be a single DoF or Manager around

Klopps interview should be a fun watch.

Think that's some way between a red and yellow tbh, could see it both ways.

He's played Schar in every game since he came in like, and called him "his perfect centre-back" think it's pretty obvious which one it is.

Kane is missing a fucking load today

Not really given Schar was absolutely on his knees against Liverpool, and we barely had any recovery time. Can bet the various sports scientists we have where saying he needed resting. Personally I'd rather Clark be played in this one game then Schar getting injured and Clark having to be played in our winnable games.

That not a penalty? Looked pretty blatant.

Blatant res, Kane has history of that

Che Adams and Maupey would get into our team ahead of Fraser and Almiron, and Wood is very useful in the way he plays the game and is a 10+ goal a season striker.

Them four players are comfortably better then 90% of our squad, Sissoko even with his legs gone would walk into our CM, ahead of Jonjo, Longstaff, Hayden and Willock.

Starting 11 players from each of them clubs that are better then what we have, and would jump in our team: Leeds: Ayling, Phillips, Dallas, Klich, Raphinha, James, Bamford, Harrison Burnley: Pope, Tarkowski, Wood, Mee - Burnley are in the bottom three with us so it doesnt disprove my point. Norwich: Gilmour, Aarons, Cantwell - Norwich are in the bottom three with us so it doesnt disprove my point. Southampton: Livramento, JWP, Walker-Peters, Romeu, Redmond, Che Adams, even both the Armstrongs would at the very least offer more to us them most of our squad. Brighton: Dunk, Lallana, Bissouma, Gross, Maupay, Lamptey, Sanchez. Watford: King, Sarr, Dennis, Sissoko. And thats without me knowing that much about there sqauds.