I've read this post a few times now and I'm still struggling to grasp the point you're apparently trying to make, assuming that you are indeed trying to make a point and not doing a Bristow?
isn't he saying eatock was abused when a player at NUFC but the abuse was unrelated to the club itself?
Well he's wrong, it was on the club's watch.
The article said he was stalked to his hotel, unlike the Crewe case where Gradi was driving kids to Bennell's house.
There was simply no knowledge and we binned him immediately when we found out. Unlike Crewe.
Having only skimmed the article as I'm at work, I can't see that in the article?