Jump to content

Manxst

Member
  • Posts

    4,475
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Manxst

  1. How much would you expect? Personally think that £30m is on the low side, but he’s 18, with 12 senior games under his belt and although he has a few years left to go on his current contract, it seems like he might not sign a new deal.
  2. Starting to run out of first team academy players to sell too. Most of the current squad have been bought for big money on big wages - Gallagher, Colwill, Chalobah, Hall, Broja, Hudson-Odoi and James being the exceptions. Some of those (and they’ve probably got a few youth players too) they can shift for some money but nowhere near a Mount sized fee (except James who they won’t want to sell, presumably), or what they’re going to need in the future to balance FFP.
  3. Prevents players wanting leave, having guaranteed income (on large wages too) for 8 years. Injuries, loss of form, requirement to upgrade, requirement to get players to leave for financial reasons eg relegation, change of ownership et. - they’ll find it hard to shift anyone.
  4. It is. But the actual contract length can be anything.
  5. Aye, because he was on the bench and came on because of Timbers injury as their defensive options were limited. Had Tierney been on the bench, undoubtedly he would’ve come on instead.
  6. Tomiyasu has never played LB though?
  7. We can ‘overpay’ only so many times before falling foul of FFP though, and it seems like we’re near the end of our limit this window?
  8. It’s talking about a loan to buy because of our lack of (allowed) funds- no way would Milan do that.
  9. He would be, IF he can stay fit.
  10. So? They agreed the fee for him and he was happy to sign for them. I don’t get the conspiracy theory?
  11. Absolutely- I was just interested if Celtic had confirmed anything like you said though.
  12. Both are just rehashes of Galetti guessing- nothing from Celtic at all?
  13. Where’s this info from?
  14. Should do a double bill with Musk vs Zuch
  15. So there’s zero evidence he would sign for less money then? Just can’t see him giving up a three year £50k per week contract. We’re definitely going to have to subsidise wages if these players ever move to the championship.
  16. We agreed to pay £30k of his £50k for Norwich. He didn’t drop any money?
  17. Nah, just was nowhere near his man and poor defending.
  18. Not for his current £50k per week he wouldn’t.
  19. Completely left Diaz for the goal?
  20. 2-1 to Chelsea. Klopp gonna need new gnashers edit- going to be offside
  21. “Chelsea had agreed to be sponsored by U.S. streaming service Paramount Plus, however the move was rejected by the Premier League due to concerns it could cause problems with the league’s broadcast partners. Sky Sports, TNT Sports and Amazon Prime are the Premier League’s current broadcast partners in the UK, and the league has a TV deal with NBC Sports in the U.S meaning any potential deal was judged to not be permitted under the league’s Deed of License. There were also talks between the club and Stake, but supporters voiced their opposition to being sponsored by a gambling firm and no deal was agreed.” they’ve now agreed a sponsorship with ‘Infinite Athlete’ but final details haven’t yet been agreed/PL haven’t signed it off, depending on sources.
×
×
  • Create New...