They all voted for it so should be well aware of the impact plus these rules obviously affect the ambitious ones the most.
Btw glad to see your back and posting again
In 2023 our amortization plus salaries were higher than turnover. To be compliant we would need to reduce either turnover or amortization or sell someone.
Rancid rules.
The reasoning for that is due to alignment with Uefa rules which is fine in principle. The issue is the punishments which do and will continue to differ.
One thing is clear, Forest absolutely took the piss out of us. Give us one of your best young talents we will give you one of the worst goal keepers in premier league history and 15mil.
The rumblings over the past couple of days seems to indicate he might fail the no dickhead rule.
Also isn't he right footed? For my money we are desperate for a left footer for the right flank.
Absolutely and it's an issue with the rules. The historic spend has a compounding affect. It's why if we actually wanted competitive balance we need to index for football inflation and give every club an allowance meaning they can spend as much as the highest spender.
They've basically picked the Portuguese version of ETH. highly rated manager from a second tier league with some flashes in Europe which has convinced the world he's the second coming.
The appointment is a massive risk for them.