r0cafella

Id be shocked if we were in for Elliot, I don't even recall his name being floated when we were considering selling them Gordon.

Won't be he warming the bench? Arsenal also lashing over 200m then this summer?

They only got 55m yikes very little value from a powerful card.

And to add on, buying players off the back of performances in international tournaments is generally a mistake. Let alone a youth competition

Doesnt suit our style of play? Over priced? Would help finance Liverpool's potential approach for our best player?

A third or that? No chance it's half at worst and even then it's better than nothing? 30m min We've lost out ok because of this. Also, try and think pragmatically, if we can't use related parties who's giving us more? And bro what is that analogy, you can't nail failure and success to such words, it's obviously much more complex than buzzwords. Not to mention you are entirely missing the point im making which is simply if we to be "number 1" we will need the people making such statements to do more than they currently are.

Im not referring to external sponsors. I'm talking about related party ones.

Related parties to our owners. Again these comments are on the basis of the big talk and the follow through.

No training ground sponsor, no training kit sponsor, no stadium sponsor etc. It just points to our owners not being invested to the point of us being number 1, because if this was truly the aim we can't afford to leave anything on the table.

Double post.

Citation needed. We have left a lot of sponsorship money on the table regardless of APT.

You'd imagine his numbers look awful given he played for Soton.

Isn't this hard to nail down? I mean YAR loves spouting about being number 1, kind of a weird thing to keep repeating if we are just a portfolio company. In terms of these processes they have, I'm assuming these are more investment related than anything else, either way using investment related processes to run a football club sounds bizarre.

Selling pieces at a time is a very smart way to do it. If you believe the loophole won't get closed and your not in need of massive money. The ownership of the women's team essentially becomes an overdraft facility (in financial terms).

They are trying they can't They used to do things by consensus and they've totally given up on doing things that way, it's just the cartel clubs plus the gravy train riders.

They aren't selling anyone, not at this deadline anyways. As I've been saying PSR is severely weakened and it's Chelsea who are responsible. Writings been on the wall since those academy swaps.

Do we believe the Journos who said an announcement was literally ready before the end of the season?

Aye it is, but it often repeated and appears to relate all decisions they make.

* In this transfer window

"always wanted Chelsea" What are we doing.

They would be aye, silly to post this from Maguire as the incoming chart is obviously much higher and it doesn't account for salaries.

We are already in the alternative targets tbh. We've missed out Mbuemo, Delap, Huijsen already. We are hunting in very crowded waters, it's very difficult.

I understand the sentiment but can he be? It's kinda obvious these are his targets.

Old and expensive. We can't afford players of this profile sadly.