Joey Linton

1 minute ago, Beren said:

Haven't seen much of Sancho at club level, but his link up play and directness look tasty so far.

Hi Gareth

10 hours ago, Cronky said:

Despite his goals, I still don't trust Sterling,

Mate

4 minutes ago, BlackandWhite said:

Signing McGeady on for another year is huge for them. He may be 36 next year, but that league is still so bad, that he plays like Messi in it.

This will be his 4th season playing like Messi in it. 

9 minutes ago, Joey Linton said:

Apart from Matterface. 

And Jonathan Pearce. 

Having just heard that eulogy about soucek I'd like to retract this. 

2 minutes ago, Sima said:

Tyldsley’s the worst.

Apart from Matterface. 

And Jonathan Pearce. 

4 minutes ago, Slim said:

Solid 2-2 draw with Spennymoor today

Spennymoor team

Moors: Trialist A, Magnay, Curtis, Trialist B, Moke, Anderson, Abbott, McLean, Lufudu, Taylor, Ramshaw

Subs: Trialist C, Kennedy, Chandler, Hall, Thompson, Mulhern, Hindson, Carter

7 minutes ago, Robster said:

Are we meant to remember your posts from 2 nights ago, like ?
You're not that memorable.

No mate, i was just showing you why you were wrong. Don't expect you to remember me at all. 

And to be honest @SweMagpulled up a post of mine from a year ago to try and change the subject, so he must think I'm memorable.

Infamy, infamy..... 

31 minutes ago, Robster said:

What are you talking about? The only person looking a fool is you, man.
You didn't realise Nuno had gone to Spurs. Just admit it and move on.

Here's me discussing the subject of Martinez not going to Spurs because they'd made an appointment from Wednesday night.

Just now, SweMag said:

 

 

I've not once denied posting that. It was your attempt at shifting the discussion from you looking a fool that i was laughing at.

Just now, SweMag said:

Maybe your sausage who told you the takeover was 100% done last year got this wrong as well?

Nice try. What a dafty.

1 minute ago, Lush Vlad said:

Is this some big whoosh or inside joke that I’m not getting?! What is going on here?!  

Keith reckoned it was sorted for martinez and Graeme Jones to spurs. Within 24 hours nuno was appointed. 

1 minute ago, SweMag said:

 

 

Whoosh

8 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said:

They sacked Nuno already?

Spurs mate. Not Wolves. 

Belgium out. Martinez to Spurs announced tomorrow?

4 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said:

 

Kennedy would’ve had a copy of the statement and probably told him.

 

As the club released it at exactly the same time as Sky it’s likely they released it to the media until a time embargo.

 

He’s full of shit though  that screenshot of ‘the club’ phoning him. Jesus wept.

"Charnaz Mobile" 

Bought that

1 minute ago, BennyBlanco said:

 
He contradicts himself so much, almost like he’s making it up.

 

As for the wraith show, that braggart of a dentist and his mate who’s a poundshop Peter Stringfellow are just the worst. They’ve managed to shoehorn themselves into a position where people think they’ve got the inside scoop, that all stemmed from the Dentist getting conned into believing the last Sheikh was legit, telling everyone they were the real deal. He doesn’t like being reminded of that.

I don't mind it if you take it for what it is.

Not worth getting worked up by them, they do enough themselves week on week to discredit their own information and exclusives.

It's the sort of thing which is common amongst the fans of all clubs these days, the self styled social media personality. 

5 minutes ago, Pokerprince2004 said:

Good statement that, better than I thought they'd do. Well done lads

It is a decent statement.

I just hope their next tweets aren't "Why not join the trust?" or "Sign up to the pledge". 

CPS confirm they are seeking a retrial of the female officer. 

4 hours ago, Whitley mag said:

All positive in the hood lads, pressure and spotlight ramping up on those that stand in our way.

 

 

 

Surely posting all of that makes it even less likely that the premier league will do this in public though? 

Just now, Abacus said:

But what I mean is, why wouldn't they want the decision and the reasons behind it to be transparent in that case?

Because their legal team don't see it as being beneficial i would imagine. 

Just now, Abacus said:

Why?

Because its of no benefit to them when it comes to winning or losing. The evidence will be heard by those making the final decision regardless of whether it's also done in public. And the rules dictate that its done in private by default.