KetsbaiaIsBald

It’s only now I can appreciate how good a goal that was. Too stressed at the time!!

It’s definitely going to be one of those go mental moments.

I don’t think so. But it’s good question.

We fucking needed that. I needed that.

Fuck me, that was tense

Wolves slow game down. Waste so much time. Nothing said. Newcastle slow the game down. Talked about.

Don’t foul him, don’t foul him. Fouls him.

I’ve just think he hasn’t been to central of all of our play, which are usually is. He’s had 2-3 moments of quality.

I reckon if the penalty was given they’d be complaining that it was soft and you look for it.

Bruno quiet. Willock good. maxim Isak link up good. penalty appeal he jumps off the ground into pope. Then there is contact.

And third and forth. Please ?

ankle, out for few weeks

Rednap -Notts Forest

Do you have sources for this so I can read up? Or is this opinion?

Or did they close down the legitimate routes as we’re overwhelmed with the quantity of applications through the other routes? I honestly don’t know.

I honestly do t think we’re a million miles away in our views. We need to fix the uk forcing people into dangerous routes. I just hope this comes after the current routes are closed. I think the message could have been better delivered if we were doing both at the same time. We’re closing this though ever means, this is how we plan to facilitate legitimate routes.

so 40% don’t…. I.e a combination!

So we agree ?

Or they’re coming in boats as they don’t have a legitimate asylum claim. More likely it’s a combination of both. And by opposite I think you’re just talking about the order in which things are changed.

Once the current routes are closed as long as controlled routes are opened I am all for the current steps being taken. At the moment we have criminal gangs profiteering and people drowning. What ever needs to be to stop this should be done. As I say as long as we then open up ligitimate ways for people to seek asylum.

If Newcastle wanted to play games this is the bit I cannot see how it can be legal. 1. Newcastle create a paper trail. 2. Saudi Company one and Saudi company two both want to sponsor Newcastle as they believe that it will take off in Saudi due to the PIF ownership. 3. The "bidding war" makes the price * 10 of Man Utd (to be daft for the sake of the argument) 4. The premier league attempt to block this. 5. Newcastle take them to court. How could any court say that in that particular market where there is only 1 Newcastle. That the figure is not market value?

Why’s it taking so long to decide on Toney’s betting punishment?

Hopefully it highlights ffp for what it is and shows that football is being won at the executive level through richer clubs keeping others down. For example the mad rush to change the rules after they took over. It could be a way to keep the fair market value decision honest knowing some of it could end up on tv.

deleted.

Come on Newcastle. Please. Bit of luck. Come on.