Cheshire Mag Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 The guy hardly played for Fulham and has hardly played for Derby because of injuries, if his contract expries next year and he's injured for most of it. Why should we bother? W Same as we have done with Pancrate? Just because he has been released by his club, doesnt automatically mean he is shite you know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 The guy hardly played for Fulham and has hardly played for Derby because of injuries, if his contract expries next year and he's injured for most of it. Why should we bother? W Because he's good. Get him on a pay as you play contract to minimise the risk But mate, he's injured. But he won't always be injured. Wait until he's fit and then snap him up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 The guy hardly played for Fulham and has hardly played for Derby because of injuries, if his contract expries next year and he's injured for most of it. Why should we bother? W Same as we have done with Pancrate? Just because he has been released by his club, doesnt automatically mean he is s**** you know. I didn't say he was shite, but he's well known for having a bad injury record. He's currently out with a ruptured achilies tendon which he had to have surgery on. I bet he would require some sort of signing on fee, as he won't just move up here without some form of financial gurantee. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheshire Mag Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 The guy hardly played for Fulham and has hardly played for Derby because of injuries, if his contract expries next year and he's injured for most of it. Why should we bother? Same as we have done with Pancrate? Just because he has been released by his club, doesnt automatically mean he is s**** you know. I didn't say he was shite, but he's well known for having a bad injury record. He's currently out with a ruptured achilies tendon which he had to have surgery on. I bet he would require some sort of signing on fee, as he won't just move up here without some form of financial gurantee. Shirley, if we were going to sign him, we would offer a very low wage P/W and then offer bonuses on a pay as you play basis. Then again, deals like that, are too complex for us.................. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Admitedly it would be a risk but, given his undoubted quality, a risk worth taking in my opinion. His fits the bill perfectly in terms of Ashley's signings policy - good, young and most importantly.. FREE Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 I would definitely go for it. Especially with an eye towards next season if we are promoted. If he recovers from injury, we will have acquired a Premiership level player for nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Rather get Dean Ashton in than Giles Barnes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Rather get Dean Ashton in Giles Barnes. He's on a free as well I think Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 I think Derby just released him from his contract. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 I think Derby just released him from his contract. erm?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 The guy hardly played for Fulham and has hardly played for Derby because of injuries, if his contract expries next year and he's injured for most of it. Why should we bother? Same as we have done with Pancrate? Just because he has been released by his club, doesnt automatically mean he is s**** you know. I didn't say he was s****, but he's well known for having a bad injury record. He's currently out with a ruptured achilies tendon which he had to have surgery on. I bet he would require some sort of signing on fee, as he won't just move up here without some form of financial gurantee. Shirley, if we were going to sign him, we would offer a very low wage P/W and then offer bonuses on a pay as you play basis. Then again, deals like that, are too complex for us.................. Ergo my point, you are going to offer a wage to someone who has failed to prove fitness for close to 3 seasons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 I think Derby just released him from his contract. erm?! THY RLY HV U KNW. Hew man, u set ur sarcasm detector to fail? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Rather get Chris Boyd in from Rangers for next to nothing in January. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Anyone know the linke to busies Derby County messageboard I wouldnt mind reading the crack about Giles. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Rather get Chris Boyd in from Rangers for next to nothing in January. He any relation to Kris? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bovineblue Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Rather get Dean Ashton in Giles Barnes. Setting up a gay matchmaking service for footballers? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 I think Derby just released him from his contract. erm?! THY RLY HV U KNW. Hew man, u set ur sarcasm detector to fail? Started early on the pop, everything's failed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Wonder if Villa would take £500k for Beye? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Wonder if Villa would take £500k for Beye? You'd still want him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Wonder if Villa would take £500k for Beye? Haven't been keeping up with him, how's he been doing there? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Wonder if Villa would take £500k for Beye? Haven't been keeping up with him, how's he been doing there? He is getting messed around like Shorey was last season at Villa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Wonder if Villa would take £500k for Beye? You'd still want him? Could we sign a better RB for less than that? He's obviously not getting his game and we're looking quite good for promotion, so why not? We haven't got a RB on our books and adding Simpson and Beye for a million would be good business if we can swing it with Man U and Villa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjmc Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Wonder if Villa would take £500k for Beye? You'd still want him? Could we sign a better RB for less than that? He's obviously not getting his game and we're looking quite good for promotion, so why not? We haven't got a RB on our books and adding Simpson and Beye for a million would be good business if we can swing it with Man U and Villa. they may not have paid us all the milner money so could in theory cost us nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Wonder if Villa would take £500k for Beye? You'd still want him? Could we sign a better RB for less than that? He's obviously not getting his game and we're looking quite good for promotion, so why not? We haven't got a RB on our books and adding Simpson and Beye for a million would be good business if we can swing it with Man U and Villa. they may not have paid us all the milner money so could in theory cost us nothing. Did you used to dabble in the subprime markets? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjmc Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Wonder if Villa would take £500k for Beye? You'd still want him? Could we sign a better RB for less than that? He's obviously not getting his game and we're looking quite good for promotion, so why not? We haven't got a RB on our books and adding Simpson and Beye for a million would be good business if we can swing it with Man U and Villa. they may not have paid us all the milner money so could in theory cost us nothing. Did you used to dabble in the subprime markets? nope living mortgage free thanks I guess i didnt explain myself well I meant there wouldnt be any outlay free Ashleys pocket if there is still a balance to pay of Milner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts